Skip to content
HeyJared

Vincent Smolczynski

Reporter · US

Indexed articles, last 90 days
3
Latest publication
Sep 3, 2026
Outlet visibility, for Mondaq
Top 500K sites
Earliest in this view
Jul 29, 2026

Latest articles

  1. Article · Sep 3, 2026 · Vincent Smolczynski

    California SB690 – A Bill That Significantly Narrows Website Tracking Claims – Sent To Governor’s Desk (opens the original)

    Excerpt · English

    Read excerpt

    California lawmakers have sent Senate Bill 690 to Governor Gavin Newsom, teeing up a narrowing of website-tracking litigation under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), who has until September 30 to sign or veto the legislation. If signed, the bill would eliminate private lawsuits asserting website-based “pen register” and “trap and trace” claims under Section 638.51 of CIPA. For businesses that have received demand letters or are defending lawsuits premised on routine website technolo

  2. Article · Aug 14, 2026 · Vincent Smolczynski

    Federal Court Follows Bartholomew Reasoning In Denying Motion To Dismiss ALPR Lawsuit (opens the original)

    Excerpt · English

    Read excerpt

    Senior United States District Judge William H. Orrick, sitting in the Northern District of California, denied a motion to dismiss last week in an Automated License Plate Recognition (“ALPR”) matter, McGinty v. Reimagined Parking LLC, d/b/a Imperial Parking.1 Judge Orrick held that the plaintiff plausibly alleged actionable harm based on his “right to know” about the use of ALPR systems in two garages. The order follows Bartholomew v. Parking Concepts, Inc.2 and the guidance of Mata v. Digital Re

  3. Article · Jul 29, 2026 · Vincent Smolczynski

    No Actual Harm, No ALPR Claim: California Court Of Appeal Weighs In (opens the original)

    Excerpt · English

    Read excerpt

    On July 20, 2026, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District issued a notable decision in Mata v. Digital Recognition Network, Inc.,1 which addresses the standing requirements for private claims under California’s Automated License Plate Recognition (“ALPR”) law. At the heart of the decision lies the question whether a violation of the ALPR statute with no articulated resulting harm other than the subjective belief that the plaintiff’s privacy has been invaded confers standing to

Publishing over time

Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.

Recurring subjects

Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.

Audience

Top 500K sites

For Mondaq, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026

Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.

About this data

Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.

Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.

See coverage about Vincent Smolczynski