Skip to content
HeyJared

Vincent Li. PhD

Reporter

Indexed articles, last 90 days
4
Latest publication
Sep 25, 2026
Outlet visibility, for natlawreview.com
Top 1M sites
Earliest in this view
Jul 30, 2026

Latest articles

  1. Article · Sep 25, 2026 · Vincent Li. PhD

    Preamble with Backbone: “Universal” Limits Spinal-Implant Claims (opens the original)

    Excerpt · English

    Read excerpt

    The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed summary judgment and a jury verdict of noninfringement, holding that claim preambles reciting a “universal” spinal implant were limiting and that substantial evidence supported the jury’s separate finding of noninfringement. Moskowitz Family LLC v. Globus Medical, Inc., Case No. 24-1696 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 11, 2026) (Prost, Schall, Stoll, JJ.) Moskowitz sued Globus for infringing three patents directed generally to implant systems used in spi

  2. Article · Sep 10, 2026 · Vincent Li. PhD

    No Venue, No Problem- Improper Venue Doesn’t Bar District Court from Deciding Validity Challenge (opens the original)

    Excerpt · English

    Read excerpt

    The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s dismissal on both improper venue and patent eligibility grounds, finding no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision to decide a Rule 12 (b)(6) patent eligibility challenge after first determining that venue was improper. AML IP, LLC v. Bath & Body Works Direct, et al., Case No. 2025-1280 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 28, 2026) (Prost, Bryson, Reyna, JJ.) AML IP sued Bath & Body Works Direct in the US District Court for th

  3. Article · Aug 27, 2026 · Vincent Li. PhD

    Resolution Impossible- Lower Resolution Prior Art is Analogous Art to Higher Resolution Claims (opens the original)

    Excerpt · English

    Read excerpt

    The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial & Appeal Board’s decision finding that prior art disclosing a low-resolution system was analogous prior art to claims directed to a high-resolution system for purposes of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The Nielsen Company (US), LLC v. TVision Insights, Inc., Case No. 2025-1371 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 14, 2026) (Dyk, Reyna, Bissoon, JJ.) Nielsen owns a patent related to audience measurement systems that use cameras to capture i

  4. Article · Jul 30, 2026 · Vincent Li. PhD

    It’s a Wrap- Constructive Discovery Under Copyright Statute of Limitations (opens the original)

    Excerpt · English

    Read excerpt

    The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed summary judgment dismissing a copyright infringement claim as untimely, finding that the extensive publicity surrounding the accused works, combined with the copyright owner’s ties to Italy and the local art community, meant that a reasonably diligent owner should have discovered the alleged infringement years before filing suit. Hayden v. Koons, Case No. 25-498-cv (2d Cir. July 21, 2026) (Chin, Sullivan, Lee, JJ.) Michael Hayden, a US arti

Publishing over time

Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.

Recurring subjects

Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.

Audience

Top 1M sites

For natlawreview.com, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026

Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.

About this data

Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.

Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.

See coverage about Vincent Li. PhD