Skip to content
HeyJared

Rod M. Fliegel

Reporter · US

Indexed articles, last 90 days
3
Latest publication
Aug 17, 2026
Outlet visibility, for Mondaq
Top 500K sites
Earliest in this view
Jul 20, 2026
The latest indexed work is over 30 days old. There may be a gap in what we hold.

Latest articles

  1. Article · Aug 17, 2026 · Rod M. Fliegel

    Illinois Curbs Ability To Require Driver’s License In Job Postings (opens the original)

    Excerpt · Neutral tone · English

    Read excerpt

    Effective January 1, 2027, Illinois will limit the discretion covered employers have to insist on a driver’s license1 in job postings.2 HB4758 amends the Illinois Job Opportunities for Qualified Applicants Act—commonly referred as the state’s “Ban the Box law”—to restrict covered employers from stating in a job posting that applicants must have a valid driver’s license unless driving is an essential function of the job and a business necessity.3 If a license is required, the posting must include

  2. Article · Aug 10, 2026 · Rod M. Fliegel

    California Court Answers The Question: When Do California’s Laws Prohibiting Consideration Of Arrests Protect Remote Workers? (opens the original)

    Excerpt · English

    Read excerpt

    In Saberin v. Alation, Inc., the Court of Appeal considered whether California’s “no-arrest-record” statute, Labor Code section 432.7, affords protections to employees who work in a different state.1 While noting how remote work has become increasingly common since the pandemic, the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s order refusing to vacate an arbitration award in the employer’s favor. Even though the employer prevailed in its argument that the remote worker was not protected by the sta

  3. Article · Jul 20, 2026 · Rod M. Fliegel

    California Courts Of Appeal Split On State Law Standing Requirement For Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Violations (opens the original)

    Excerpt · Neutral tone · English

    Read excerpt

    On June 4, 2026, California’s First District Court of Appeal held that the state’s law on “standing” requires no “concrete” injury to pursue federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) claims in state court. The court’s opinion in Askins v. CRST Expedited reflects stark differences between federal and state standing requirements and deepens the split of authority in the California Courts of Appeal. Standing is not a merits issue but, rather, is a threshold requirement that a lawsuit must meet to pr

Publishing over time

Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.

Recurring subjects

Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.

Audience

Top 500K sites

For Mondaq, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026

Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.

About this data

Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.

Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.

See coverage about Rod M. Fliegel