HeyJaredPuja J. Amin
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 4
- Latest publication
- Sep 16, 2026
- Outlet visibility, for natlawreview.com
- Top 1M sites
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 29, 2026
Latest articles
LAWYERS CALLING YOU IN TEXAS?: Prohibited Solicitations From Lawyers or Those Marketing on Their Behalf in Texas Could Trigger $50,000 Penalties as New Barratry Claims Fill the Dockets (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Texas lawyers relying on lead generators to find potential clients had better think twice. A new wave of litigation focused on the illegal solicitation of potential clients for Texas law firms is leading to massive penalties of up to $50,000 “from each person who engaged in barratry.” The wave of so-called “barratry” claims arise under Texas Government Code §38.12 and Texas Government Code §82.0651, that allows for a private right of action when a person who was solicited through prohibited barr
SB 690 PASSES AND THE CA COURT OF APPEAL ISSUES AN IMPORTANT TENANTIVE RULING: Are CIPA Pen Register Cases Dead? Here’s What You Need to Know RIGHT NOW! (opens the original)
Read excerpt
On August 21, 2026, the California Court of Appeal issued a tentative ruling in Variety Media, LLC v. Superior Court (Case No. B350578), addressing whether CIPA’s pen register statute covers everyday website tracking technologies like cookies, pixels, and other third-party trackers. The court has tentatively rejected Variety’s argument that internet communications are categorically outside CIPA’s pen register statute while tentatively holding that the plaintiff’s complaint failed because the fac
SENATE BILL 690 PASSES CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE: SB 690 Heads to Governor’s Desk—Here’s What the Final Version Means for CIPA Litigation (opens the original)
Read excerpt
California Senate Bill 690 (“SB 690”), which originally proposed sweeping changes to the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) has now passed both the California Senate and Assembly and is headed to Governor’s desk for approval. But after undergoing significant amendments, the bill that now sits before the Governor is a much narrower version of the CIPA reform that businesses were hoping for. The final version of SB 690 is short. In fact, the bill makes just one substantive change to the P
MARKETING TEXT MESSAGES MAY NOT TRIGGER THE TCPA’S DO NOT CALL RULES—BUT THEY DEFINITELY TRIGGER THESE CRITICAL STATE TELEMARKETING LAWS (opens the original)
Read excerpt
While Stendingr and certain district court decisions may significantly reduce federal TCPA DNC exposure for manually sent marketing texts, many states expressly regulate text messages—even sent manually. Accordingly, businesses considering manual SMS campaigns in reliance on Stendingr and the like should recognize that mini-TCPAs may still be a risk even in the jurisdictions where courts have held text don’t equal calls under the TCPA. If you’re texting consumers across the country relying on th
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
Top 1M sites
For natlawreview.com, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.