HeyJaredPeter Lawrence Loh
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 4
- Latest publication
- Sep 30, 2026
- Outlet visibility, for natlawreview.com
- Top 1M sites
- Earliest in this view
- Aug 17, 2026
Latest articles
Federal Court Enforces Forum-Selection Clause in Dealer Agreement (opens the original)
Read excerpt
For nearly a decade, G.W. Van Keppel Company served as the exclusive dealer for Cemen Tech, Inc. — an Iowa-based manufacturer of concrete trucks and mixing equipment — across Oklahoma and several other states. Their written dealer agreement included a mandatory forum-selection clause requiring all disputes to be resolved in Iowa courts. When Cemen Tech terminated the agreement in January 2026, Van Keppel filed suit in federal court in Oklahoma, alleging violations of the Oklahoma Fair Practices
Maryland Amends Franchise Law — Changes Effective October 1, 2026 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Maryland has amended its Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law. The changes are effective October 1, 2026. Franchisors registered in Maryland or otherwise offering franchises subject to Maryland law should take immediate steps to ensure compliance. Extended Enforcement Authority. The period during which the Maryland Securities Commissioner may bring enforcement actions for violations of the franchise law increases from three years to five years after the violation occurs. Expanded F
Not So Fast- Washington Appeals Court Reverses Dismissal of Case Against Building Maintenance and Janitorial Services Franchisor (opens the original)
Read excerpt
From 2006-2017, NMC Franchising, LLC sold franchises to individuals operating building-maintenance and janitorial businesses. Under NMC’s model, franchisees paid an initial fee to “access” a purchased monthly volume of revenue tied to client accounts that NMC secured. Franchisees were responsible for their own equipment, staffing, hours, taxes, and legal compliance. In 2021, the State of Washington sued NMC and its parent company under the Consumer Protection Act (CPA) and the Franchise Investme
Claims Brought by Franchisor of Co-Working Concept Survive (Mostly): Key Takeaways from RGN-USF v. Megatron Workspaces (opens the original)
Read excerpt
In RGN-USF, LLC v. Megatron Workspaces of Michigan, LLC, No. 2:25-cv-10967 (E.D. Mich. May 29, 2026), a federal court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss largely sided with the Regus brand franchisor in a dispute over terminated co-working space franchises in Southeast Michigan. What happened. RGN-USF (the U.S. sublicensor of the Regus brand) entered a multi-unit development agreement and four separate franchise agreements with entities controlled by a individual named John Schmidt to open and opera
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
Top 1M sites
For natlawreview.com, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.