HeyJaredMarty Lederman
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 4
- Latest publication
- Sep 13, 2026
- Outlet visibility, for Just Security
- Top 1M sites
- Earliest in this view
- Sep 3, 2026
Latest articles
What’s Conspicuously Missing from the Government’s Supreme Court Reply Brief in the Mail Ballots Case (opens the original)
Read excerpt
This essay is a supplement to the piece I published at Just Security on Tuesday regarding the ongoing litigation over whether the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) can enforce its new Final Rule on the delivery of mail ballots. I’ll assume readers are already familiar with that piece, which (among other things) explains in some detail how the new USPS Rule would operate. A week ago, on September 4, Judge Indira Talwani issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the USPS from implementing the Rule duri
The Simplest Way for the Supreme Court to Rule in the USPS Mail Ballots Case (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Two weeks ago, in Trump v. California, the Supreme Court held that a suit brought by several states to preclude the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) from issuing a new regulation regarding mail-in ballots was premature because the USPS hadn’t yet promulgated a final rule when the states filed their suit. Three days before the Court’s decision in California, however, the USPS did promulgate its Final Rule (a fact that, for some reason, none of the Justices mentioned in their opinions). The plaintiff st
The Simplest Way for the Supreme Court to Rule in the USPS Mail Ballots Case (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Two weeks ago, in Trump v. California, the Supreme Court held that a suit brought by several states to preclude the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) from issuing a new regulation regarding mail-in ballots was premature because the USPS hadn’t yet promulgated a final rule when the states filed their suit. Three days before the Court’s decision in California, however, the USPS did promulgate its Final Rule (a fact that, for some reason, none of the Justices mentioned in their opinions). The plaintiff st
The ICC is Necessary to Protect the International Legal Order (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Each of us has had the privilege of serving as President of the Assembly of States Parties of the International Criminal Court (ICC) at different moments in its history. We have witnessed both the remarkable progress made in advancing international criminal justice and the formidable challenges that the ICC has faced since its establishment. We have, at times, been frustrated by serious shortcomings at the Court itself and the tepid engagement from its State Parties, but also enthusiastic about
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
Top 1M sites
For Just Security, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.