HeyJaredMark N. Duvall
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 8
- Latest publication
- Sep 29, 2026
- Outlet visibility, for natlawreview.com
- Top 1M sites
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 14, 2026
Latest articles
TSCA Upheaval: Fifth Circuit Vacates EPA Methylene Chloride Rule (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Some 15 months after oral argument on September 15, 2026, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued its decision on the final methylene chloride rule in East Fork Enterprises Inc v. EPA, No. 24-60227. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adopted that rule under Section 6(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The decision vacated the entire rule and is certain to affect other pending challenges to EPA risk management rules. It may also force EP
No More GRAS Self-Affirmations? FDA Proposes Mandatory GRAS Notifications (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Since Congress created the GRAS exemption in 1958, manufacturers have been able to independently determine that substances are generally recognized as safe under their intended conditions of use and therefore exempt from mandatory FDA pre-market review. FDA has long maintained voluntary GRAS notification programs. Still, companies have not been required to inform the agency of their determinations that a given ingredient is GRAS and therefore not subject to premarket review. The proposed rule wo
Fifth Circuit Vacates OSHA Rule Requiring Employers to Record Work-Related Mental Illnesses (opens the original)
Read excerpt
What Happened: On July 21, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that Section 8 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) does not authorize the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to require employers to record work-related mental illnesses. The court vacated 29 C.F.R. § 1904.5(b)(2)(ix) and set aside a citation and a $691 penalty issued to an employer alleging the failure to record a work-related mental illness. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Occupational
Illinois Restricts Cosmetic Ingredients Beginning July 1, 2028 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Starting in less than two years, Illinois’ Chemicals in Cosmetic Products Act (the Act), signed into law on July 10, 2026, will prohibit a person from knowingly manufacturing, selling, delivering, holding, or offering for sale in Illinois a cosmetic product containing any of the 24 listed intentionally added chemicals or chemical forms. The law may affect more than manufacturers of cosmetic products. Brand owners, ingredient suppliers, importers, distributors, e-commerce platforms, retailers, sa
Food Regulation Developments: Struggles to Define Ultraprocessed Foods (opens the original)
Read excerpt
State legislatures and federal agencies are showing a strong interest in defining and regulating ultraprocessed foods (UPFs), although no uniform definition has emerged. While federal agencies consider whether and how to develop a science-based definition of “ultraprocessed,” states are enacting legislation that directly regulates UPFs or ingredients commonly associated with UPFs. A bill introduced recently in California (A.B. 2244) would further this trend by creating a “Non-Ultraprocessed Cert
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
Top 1M sites
For natlawreview.com, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.