HeyJaredLuis Armando Arias
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 4
- Latest publication
- Aug 12, 2026
- Outlet visibility, for KTEP 88.5 FM
- Top 5M sites
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 15, 2026
Latest articles
Ep. 5 The Ticking Bomb (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Bombs are set to explode in the city; the culprit is not talking…but authorities have his wife in custody. What would you do? On this episode of Justice Unraveled, Professor Luis Armando Arias and his mentee analyze "The Ticking Bomb", a variation of the first episode, "The Mad Bomber," where the puzzle is approached from a different perspective. Should one pay the price to save the rest? No matter how many times you question what is right or wrong, Justice will always be unraveled.
Ep. 4 The Panza's Paradox (opens the original)
Read excerpt
There was a bridge, and at the end of it, gallows. Authorities proclaimed that if those who intended to cross were untruthful, they would die on the gallows. The day came when a passerby declared, "I shall cross to my death by the gallows". Authorities are questioning their own claim. What would you do? On this episode of Justice Unraveled, Professor Luis Armando Arias and his mentee analyze "The Panza's Paradox", a complex legal puzzle that will make you question your own core beliefs. No matte
Ep. 2 The Speluncean Explorers (opens the original)
Read excerpt
5 cave explorers are trapped; the survival rate is slim, and when they are rescued, only 4 come out. The case is brought before a fictional court where 5 justices offer a range of interpretations on whether the defendants should be punished. Their opinions highlight different legal philosophies such as strict 'interpretation of the law', 'natural law theory', and 'the difference between legal and moral considerations'. What is right, and what is wrong? Find out more on this second episode of Jus
Ep. 1 The Mad Bomber (opens the original)
Read excerpt
The authorities cannot make him divulge the location of the bombs by conventional methods. He refuses to say anything and requests a lawyer to invoke his right to counsel under the 6th Amendment, and protect his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination. In exasperation, a high-level official suggests torture. This would be illegal, of course, but the official thinks that it is, nevertheless, the right thing to do in this desperate situation. Do you agree? If you do, would it also be morall
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Not enough subject data for this period yet.
Audience
Top 5M sites
For KTEP 88.5 FM, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.