HeyJaredKelly Sandberg
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 7
- Latest publication
- Oct 1, 2026
- Outlet visibility, for natlawreview.com
- Top 1M sites
- Earliest in this view
- Aug 5, 2026
Latest articles
BETTER LATE THAN NEVER?: Ohio District Court Grants Motion For Reconsideration Six Years After Facebook v. Duguid. (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Hi, TCPAWorld! Kelly Sandberg here, with some case law revival, six years after the significant ruling in Facebook v. Duguid emerged. In Phillip Ramsey v. Receivables Performance Management, LLC, Plaintiff Ramsey had previously brought an action in 2016 against Receivables Performance Management, LLC and Howard George (collectively “Defendants”) for violations of the TCPA by using automated technology to call Plaintiff’s cellphone 245 times without his consent. Phillip Ramsey v. Receivables Perf
WAITING, WAITING, WAITING: A California Federal Court Stays Another Claim Pending The California Court of Appeal’s Decision On CIPA § 638.51. (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Hi, CIPAWorld! Kelly Sandberg here, with yet another case discussing the need for a California Court’s assessment on the issue of whether the California Invasion of Privacy Act § 638.51 applies to internet communications. In Dominique Nelson v. Reddit Inc., Plaintiff Dominique Nelson brought action against Defendant Reddit, Inc. for violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) § 638.50 (b) and § 638.51(a) for using a third-party tracking tool on their website that constituted a
FCC CRACKDOWN ON ILLEGAL ROBOCALLERS!: The Federal Communications Commission Removes 14 Named Companies From Its Robocall Mitigation Database. (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Hi, TCPAWorld! Kelly Sandberg here, with an important update on the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) continued plan of attack on illegal robocallers. On September 2, 2026, the FCC removed 14 voice service providers from its Robocall Mitigation Database because they failed to comply with the FCC’s robocall rules. These service providers are now effectively prohibited from connecting to U.S. networks. To give some background, the Robocall Mitigation Database was established to combat ille
DRILLING DOWN ON PRIVACY ALLEGATIONS: Northern District Of California Dismisses Data Privacy Claims (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Hi, CIPAWorld! Kelly Sandberg here, with a case on the importance of properly pleading data privacy claims. In Annabel Kady, et al., v. Opencare Inc., Plaintiff Annabel Kady and Plaintiff Taylor (“Plaintiffs”) brought action against Defendant Opencare Inc., (“Opencare”) for installing third party tracking tools on their website that allegedly collected Plaintiffs private information. Annabel Kady, et al., v. Opencare Inc., No. 4:25-CV-05037-KAW, 2026 WL 2574336 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2026). Plainti
A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION: The Southern District of California Grants Motion To Stay Pending The Outcome Of A California State Court Case (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Hi, CIPAWorld! Kelly Sandberg here, with a case on how a California Superior Court case may provide further persuasive authority as to whether the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) applies to internet communications. In Maeve Camplisson; David Sanchez; & S.D. v. Adidas America, Inc., Plaintiffs Maeve Camplisson, David Sanchez, and S.D., (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) asserted CIPA violations against Defendant Adidas America, Inc. (“Adidas”) for installing and using tracking pixels on Pla
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
Top 1M sites
For natlawreview.com, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.