Skip to content
HeyJared

Keerti Jaya

Reporter

Indexed articles, last 90 days
3
Latest publication
Sep 2, 2026
Outlet visibility, for natlawreview.com
Top 1M sites
Earliest in this view
Aug 10, 2026

Latest articles

  1. Article · Sep 2, 2026 · Keerti Jaya

    YOU MOVED? WELL, YOUR LAW DID NOT: Article III Standing Limits Survive Venue Shifts in Consumer Tracking Litigation (opens the original)

    Excerpt · English

    Read excerpt

    Sometimes a privacy case gets decided before anyone argues about privacy. This is one of those. On September 1, 2026, Judge Paul A. Engelmayer dismissed a putative class action against mParticle, Inc. and its parent, Rokt US Corp., under Rule 12(b)(1). Hayward v. mParticle, Inc., No. 25 Civ. 8173 (PAE), 2026 WL 2582794 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 1, 2026). No injury in fact. And because the Court found no standing, it never reached the 12(b)(6) arguments at all. Three California plaintiffs — Hayward, Garcia

  2. Article · Aug 19, 2026 · Keerti Jaya

    SIX PIXELS AND A SOFA: Wayfair Threw Everything At This CIPA Complaint And Only Won The Claim The Plaintiff Forgot To Defend. (opens the original)

    Excerpt · Critical tone · English

    Read excerpt

    Picture the whole thing starting with a lamp. An individual named Joseph Limas goes to wayfair.com looking for furniture, like most of us have. Home decor, lighting fixtures, bedding, bath, some outdoor stuff, maybe a shelving unit. Normal Tuesday night browsing. He’s a real shopper — he says so in the complaint, and the Court took him at his word. What he alleges he didn’t know is that six other companies were in the room with him. Including TikTok, Meta, Pinterest, Snapchat, Twitter/X and Redd

  3. Article · Aug 10, 2026 · Keerti Jaya

    THE FAX SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES: Third Circuit Revives TCPA Class Action Against J&J and Holds a “Patient Support” Fax Can Absolutely Be an Advertisement (opens the original)

    Excerpt · English

    Read excerpt

    Junk fax cases are supposed to be the sleepy corner of the TCPA, this week shows otherwise. On August 7 the Third Circuit reversed a dismissal and held that a two-page fax about a drug maker’s patient assistance program was plausibly an unsolicited advertisement. S.A.S.B. Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems Inc., No. 25-2302, 2026 WL 2276867 (3d Cir. Aug. 7, 2026). If your compliance team has been telling itself that a fax is safe because it says “support” instead of “buy,” read this

Publishing over time

Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.

Recurring subjects

Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.

Audience

Top 1M sites

For natlawreview.com, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026

Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.

About this data

Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.

Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.

See coverage about Keerti Jaya