HeyJaredJulius Melnitzer
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 4
- Latest publication
- Sep 21, 2026
- Outlet visibility, for Law Times
- Top 5M sites
- Earliest in this view
- Sep 9, 2026
Latest articles
Power of attorney owes no duty of care to grantor's daughter, OCA rules (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Husband holding wife's power of attorney had no duty to tell her daughter of hospitalizations and death A person acting under a power of attorney for personal care owes no duty of care to the incapable grantor’s adult child, the Court of Appeal for Ontario has ruled. In McNeill v. Phillips, 2026 ONCA 652, released Sept. 15, a panel of Justices Bradley Miller, Gary Trotter and Jill Copeland dismissed Sandra McNeill’s appeal from a Superior Court order striking her claim against Kenneth Phillips.
THC sticker enough for warrantless search, OCA rules (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Defence lawyers say Cannabis Control Act asks too little of officers conducting warrantless searches A vape pen bearing a THC sticker, sitting beside a vehicle’s gearshift, gave police reasonable grounds to search the car and its occupant without a warrant, despite not questioning the driver or examining the pen, the Court of Appeal for Ontario has ruled. Criminal defence lawyers have criticized the ruling. What emerges, they say, is how little the Cannabis Control Act asks of police before they
Jewish lawyers’ group decries LSO inaction on antisemitism at TMU (opens the original)
Read excerpt
LSO rejected motion seeking withdrawal of TMU’s accreditation, Muslim lawyer supports ‘measured response’ The Canadian Jewish Law Association (CJLA) has criticized the Law Society of Ontario (LSO) for its response to the Benotto report on antisemitism at Toronto Metropolitan University (TMU) and called for regulatory and governmental oversight of the university’s Lincoln Alexander School of Law. “The LSO is not taking this issue seriously enough,” wrote CJLA chair Joseph Neuberger of Neuberger &
Licensees may obtain disclosure in interlocutory suspension proceedings (opens the original)
Read excerpt
LSO tribunal accepts LSO reading of disclosure rule but refuses its ‘exceptional circumstances’ test The Law Society Tribunal has ruled that licensees may be entitled to disclosure in support of their responses to interlocutory suspension proceedings. The Tribunal accepted the Law Society of Ontario’s submission that it had no disclosure obligations at all on interlocutory suspension motions absent a Tribunal order. But it rejected the notion that licensees had to demonstrate “exceptional circum
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
Top 5M sites
For Law Times, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.