HeyJaredHenry Gass
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 5
- Latest publication
- Sep 11, 2026
- Outlet visibility, for The Christian Science Monitor
- Top 500K sites
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 7, 2026
Latest articles
Who runs US elections? Why the Constitution puts states and Congress in charge. (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Having overthrown a monarch, the founders of the United States imbued their new governing documents with a distrust of centralized power. That distrust extended to elections. Instead of elections run by a central government, the Constitution entrusts the states with determining the “Times, Places, and Manner” of voting for senators and representatives. Congress can pass laws governing how elections work, the document adds, but state and local officials would carry out the bulk of that work. The
Can you vote by mail this fall? What to know about court cases underway. (opens the original)
Read excerpt
With the 2026 midterm elections less than three months away, courts are still deciding exactly how some Americans will be able to vote. Since April, a series of high-stakes legal battles have been cycling through the federal court system in response to an executive order issued by President Donald Trump that aims to create federal lists of eligible voters and restrict voting by mail. This week, the U.S. Supreme Court lifted a lower court order blocking the Trump administration from moving forwar
Cyberattacks on water facilities test US defenses, reveal gaps (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Over two days in late July, water supply managers from Georgia to South Dakota saw their screens go dark and their controls go haywire. Hackers gained access to dozens of water utilities around the country, according to state and federal officials. They infiltrated computer systems, seizing control of equipment that prevents flooding and tap water contamination for hundreds of thousands of Americans. The FBI confirmed July 30 that cyber attackers hit water and wastewater utility companies in sev
Birthright citizenship survived Supreme Court, but the debate will continue (opens the original)
Read excerpt
The Supreme Court ruling that affirmed birthright citizenship is not likely to end the national discussion over the meaning of the 14th Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court had recently voted down President Donald Trump’s attempt to reinterpret the birthright citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment, but the small crowd of activists in front of the high court, sheltering under umbrellas as a thunderstorm moved off, were wary of letting their guard down. Laura Horn had traveled to the capital from Y
How this Supreme Court term empowered the president – and reined him in (opens the original)
Read excerpt
The Supreme Court’s latest term featured landmark cases on presidential authority. While the high court deepened the president’s power over the executive branch, the justices also restrained it in some areas. A deliberate, slow-moving institution like the U.S. Supreme Court measures time not in years or decades but in eras. In that context, the court’s recently concluded term will likely be remembered as one in which several long-term trends stopped being trends and became firm realities. Specif
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
Top 500K sites
For The Christian Science Monitor, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.