HeyJaredCharles Rotter
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 6
- Latest publication
- Sep 18, 2026
- Outlet visibility, for Watts Up With That?
- Top 500K sites
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 9, 2026
Latest articles
Why ‘Feel Good’ Climate Activism? - Watts Up With That? (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Sam Belfied in his essay, “Climate Activism: ‘It Made Me Feel Like a Good Person’” (August 19, 2026), has a number of interesting insights on the motivations of climate campaigners given the intellectual case that their cause is both futile and wasteful. And ecologically damaging (think wind and solar industrialization). Excerpts follow verbatim; footnotes can be found in the original. The following commentary and research findings suggest that climate ideology and activism are psychological com
Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #706 - Watts Up With That? (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Quote of the Week: “To know that we know what we know, and to know that we do not know what we do not know, that is true knowledge.” — Nicolaus Copernicus Number of the Week: 0.4°F (0.4F°) or 0.2°C (0.2C°) By Ken Haapala, President, Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP) Scope: This TWTW begins with a discussion of Willie Soon’s contribution to the book Canary In a Climate World. It continues with a discussion of El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) which is occurring. TWTW discusses the
NOAA Proposes Amending the Fifth National Climate Assessment (NCA5) - Watts Up With That? (opens the original)
Read excerpt
For more than a decade, some of the most frightening claims about future climate change came from a scenario called RCP8.5. Most people never heard that name on the evening news. Instead, they heard the results. Temperatures could soar by 2100. Sea levels could rise dramatically. Heat deaths could climb. Crop yields could fall. Wildfires could worsen. Electricity demand could explode. Economic damages could reach enormous levels. Behind many such projections sat RCP8.5, or its newer cousin, SSP5
A Fifth Circuit Ruling on Gas Stoves, or Is It? - Watts Up With That? (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Charles Rotter The Fifth Circuit decided State of Mississippi v. Department of Energy yesterday. Seven states petitioned. Seven states won. The Department of Energy's rule on home cooking appliances goes back to the agency. That is the easy part. The interesting part is who was defending the rule, and what that same department was doing across town while it did. First, let me take some air out of the balloon. This was not the gas stove ban You will see headlines today saying the court killed the
“If your ironclad proof that Big Oil secretly knew their products cause global warming is a leaked industry memo … why would you alter it to make it look more plausible?” - Watts Up With That? (opens the original)
Read excerpt
The pushers of climate litigation lawfare keep bizarrely paying out enough rope to hang themselves. The latest instance over the span of just the last eight weeks comes courtesy of the Public Citizen liberal climate policy advocacy group …. and they basically nail themselves to the wall along with every other major promulgator who is enslaved to the never-implemented “reposition global warming as theory” ‘leaked industry memo.’ From my most recent periodic internet search for the notorious “repo
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
Top 500K sites
For Watts Up With That?, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.