HeyJaredCharles Gideon Korrell
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 10
- Latest publication
- Sep 28, 2026
- Outlet visibility, for natlawreview.com
- Top 1M sites
- Earliest in this view
- Aug 18, 2026
Latest articles
Constellation Designs v. LG Shows Why Patent Strategy and Standards Strategy Must Work Together (opens the original)
Read excerpt
For technology companies operating in standards-driven markets, patent value depends on more than whether engineers have developed an innovative solution. The scope and structure of the patent claims can determine both whether the patent survives an eligibility challenge and how efficiently it can later be enforced against products implementing an industry standard. The Federal Circuit’s modified decision in Constellation Designs, LLC v. LG Electronics Inc., No. 24-1822 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 31, 2026)
T-Mobile v DAIFI: Patent Settlements Need Objective Triggers for Post-PTP Payments (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Patent settlements are supposed to convert litigation uncertainty into contractual certainty. The precedential Federal Circuit decision of T-Mobile US, Inc. v. KAIFI LLC, issued August 28, 2026, illustrates what can happen when a settlement resolves the infringement case but leaves the economic consequences of a pending Patent Office proceeding insufficiently defined. The dispute arose from a settlement and patent license that required T-Mobile to make an additional payment if an asserted patent
Patent Venue Is Not a Safe from an Early Merits Ruling (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Patent plaintiffs sometimes treat venue and substantive validity as separate stages of litigation. First, determine where the case belongs, then litigate whether the asserted patent can survive. The Federal Circuit’s decision in AML IP, LLC v. Bath & Body Works Direct, Inc., Case No. 2025-1280 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 28, 2026), shows why that assumption can be strategically dangerous. The court held that a district court that finds patent venue improper may nevertheless decide a fully briefed merits def
Federal Circuit Shows Why Standing Strategy Can Decide a Patent Policy Challenge Before the Merits (opens the original)
Read excerpt
A challenge to federal patent policy can raise an important substantive question and still fail without a court ever deciding whether the challenged policy is lawful. The Federal Circuit’s decision in US Inventor, Inc. v. Squires, Case No. 24-2378 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 21, 2026), illustrates why Article III standing must be treated as a central part of litigation strategy, not as a procedural formality addressed after the merits have been developed. Inventor-advocacy organizations challenged language
Patent Settlements Can Reshape the Damages Available in Future Infringement Cases (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Patent settlements are usually negotiated to end a particular dispute. But the Federal Circuit’s decision in VDPP, LLC v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. illustrates why their consequences may extend well beyond the defendant receiving the release or license. A settlement that authorizes continued sales of products covered by the patent can affect whether the patent owner later recovers damages from entirely different defendants. That makes patent marking more than a manufacturing issue. For c
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
Top 1M sites
For natlawreview.com, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.