HeyJaredBlake Landis
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 3
- Latest publication
- Sep 23, 2026
- Outlet visibility, for natlawreview.com
- Top 1M sites
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 10, 2026
Latest articles
FLORIDA WANTS A FASTER STOP?: Proposed Florida Anti-Spam Communications Act Seeks Faster Text Opt-Outs, Leaving Questions About The FTSA’s 15-Day Rule (opens the original)
Read excerpt
It’s only fitting that when something in Florida sparks interest, we’re all over it. I’m back with a follow-up on the proposed Florida Anti-Spam Communications Act. So let’s break down the scoop. Attorney General James Uthmeier’s September 17 announcement targets impersonation scams, fake warrants, and the use of undisclosed AI voices to obtain money. Yes, you read that right! It proposes heightened felony penalties and mandatory prison time for high-volume or high-loss cases, and would make it
TEXTS ARE NOT CALLS: Seventh Circuit Becomes the First Federal Court of Appeals to Hold Text Messages Are Not “Telephone Calls” Under TCPA Section 227(c)(5), and the Map Just Changed in a BIG Way (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Huge, huge news out of Chicago. The seesaw battle we have been tracking just tilted hard toward the defense bar. In Steidinger v. Blackstone Medical Services, No. 25-2398, 2026 WL 2028517 (7th Cir. July 14, 2026), the Seventh Circuit became the first federal court of appeals to squarely hold that text messages are not “telephone calls” under Section 227(c)(5) of the TCPA. Just wow! That means no private right of action for unwanted marketing texts under the DNC rules anywhere in the Seventh Circ
NO PRIVACY IN THE HUDDLE?- NFL.com Hit with CIPA Class Action Over 182 Website Trackers (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Well, it was only a matter of time before the plaintiff’s bar set its sights on the biggest brand in American sports. With the FIFA World Cup dominating sports headlines this summer, you might think the NFL could lay low until kickoff in September. Think again. A new California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) class action landed in Alameda County Superior Court, and the defendant is none other than NFL Enterprises LLC, the company behind NFL.com. The case is Kimmons v. NFL Enterprises LLC, No.
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
Top 1M sites
For natlawreview.com, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.