HeyJaredAlejandro Tauber
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 5
- Latest publication
- Sep 30, 2026
- Outlet visibility, for EUobserver
- Top 1M sites
- Earliest in this view
- Aug 11, 2026
Latest articles
Let’s not allow AI firms to use fears of future dystopias to distract Europeans from existing problems (opens the original)
Read excerpt
“Imagine a zombie that does not hunt you, but rings your doorbell and speaks so persistently and fluently that it finally arrives at a convincing argument for feeding it your brain.” Since the current discourse around artificial intelligence has taken a turn for the gothic (“alien minds”, come on), AI researcher Eryk Salvaggio’s “erudite zombie” seems like an apt metaphor for what we’re doing. Salvaggio’s zombie helps explain what gets lost when people say an AI “went rogue.” In his reading of t
What should a more competitive Europe deliver for its citizens? Download our free report (opens the original)
Read excerpt
EUobserver’s first Stakeholder Report bring together people working on European policy to examine the choices facing the EU and what they mean for citizens. Through interviews and analysis, we explore competing perspectives, practical priorities and questions that deserve a wider debate. Economic Competitiveness and European Citizens, published ahead of Ursula von der Leyen’s State of the Union address on 16 September, asks a question that should inform both the speech and the political year ahe
[Interview] Could musicians and dancers in Europe revolt against AI using their work? ‘It should be possible’, says performing arts boss (opens the original)
Read excerpt
The debate around AI and the creative sector often revolves around authorship and copyright. Someone creates something; an article, a piece of music, a book, and AI companies take that and use it to train a machine that can then regurgitate that work in a different context or order. But what if you are a musician, actor or dancer who is not an author? When your salary is paid for performing the work authored by someone else? Who has the right to say what happens to what you create? Interestingly
[Interview] Does copyright protect your AI-generated content in Europe? Let’s find out (opens the original)
Read excerpt
To remain compliant with the EU’s AI Act, AI-giant Anthropic announced they would be adding an invisible watermark to text generated by its chatbot Claude. Especially on LinkedIn, a social platform for professionals, which recently added an option to flag content as AI slop – after research estimated over one third of the copy posted on the site was AI-generated. Some came up with clever ways around the watermark (no, copy-pasting into plain text does not work). Others cancelled their Claude acc
Reverse centaurs: EU approach to AI risks dystopia for human workers (opens the original)
Read excerpt
The EU’s approach to AI changed substantially last June, but, to most, it went unnoticed. Instead of regulating the risks of AI, the European Commission now seems preoccupied with making AI happen. Whether you are a fan of AI or not, as a human, that should worry you. The Cloud and AI Development Act (CADA), published in June as a flagship of the EU’s Tech Sovereignty package, illustrates this new push. Were you to read Titles II and III of CADA, you might notice something odd: Almost none of th
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
Top 1M sites
For EUobserver, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.