yueliusd’s Substack
This publication reveals fundamental flaws in mainstream microwave absorption research while exposing systematic problems in academic peer review that suppress innovative scientific viewpoints.
- Indexed issues, last 90 days
- 63
- Latest publication
- Oct 1, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Sep 6, 2026
Latest issues
The Fallacy of Collective Supremacy: Why Teamwork Ideology and Resource Coordination Undermine Paradigm-Shifting Scientific Breakthroughs (opens the original)
Read excerpt
写一篇英文文章评论视频Liu, Yue, The Fallacy of Collective Supremacy: How Teamwork Ideology and Student-Centered Education Undermine Scientific Progress (October 27, 2025). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5664450 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5664450Teamwork Ideology and Student-Cente
Every Solved Problem Looks Simple (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Comparing Myself with Wang Hong and Deng Yu: Which Kind of Scientific Problem Is Harder?Any Simple Thing Is Not Simple; Any Complex Thing Is Not ComplexSolved Public Problems vs. Undiscovered Hidden ProblemsThanks for reading yueliusd’s Substack! Subscribe for free to
Solved Public Problems vs. Undiscovered Hidden Problems (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Comparing Myself with Wang Hong and Deng Yu: Which Kind of Scientific Problem Is Harder?Every Solved Problem Looks SimpleAny Simple Thing Is Not Simple; Any Complex Thing Is Not ComplexThanks for reading yueliusd’s Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and
If You Define Scientific Garbage Only as Fraud, You Will Never Find 95 Percent (opens the original)
Read excerpt
The Garbage Machine: How Academic Publishing Produces Useless Papers and Why AI Won’t Save ItBeyond Fraud Counts: Measuring Scientific Waste by Knowledge GainNot Peer Review Alone: Can AI Algorithms Rescue Science from Citation Bias?主流科学界不承认95%以上的SCI文章都是垃圾。ChatG
Comparing Myself with Wang Hong and Deng Yu: Which Kind of Scientific Problem Is Harder? (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Every Solved Problem Looks Simple写一篇英文文章:1 先定几个协议规矩不要为了迎合现代学术界的气场说“这里并不是真的与王虹邓煜比高低”,这是废话,只能降低对话的尖锐核锋
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.