Wealth DFM Talk
Wealth DFM Talk is the monthly podcast for UK wealth managers and DFMs.Each month, we chat with leading voices in the industry exploring market movements, macro trends and how the latest thinking is impacting portfolio construction, risk and return.
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 2
- Latest publication
- Aug 10, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 27, 2026
Latest episodes
Podcast #13: SpaceX and what passive investors need to know, with Oxford Risk’s Greg B Davies (opens the original)
Read excerpt
In this month’s episode of Wealth DFM Talk, the monthly podcast from Wealth DFM, we welcome Greg B Davies, Head of Behavioural Finance at Oxford Risk. Greg joins us to discuss SpaceX, which recently joined the Nasdaq-100. Last month, SpaceX added to its existing FTSE World and MSCI World inclusion by joining the Nasdaq-100. Millions of investors now hold SpaceX exposure through mainstream index trackers, many without realising it. Greg explains what the behavioural purpose of passive investing i
Podcast #12: Combining the benefits of passive and active investing, with Aberdeen’s Nick Millington (opens the original)
Read excerpt
In this latest edition of Wealth DFM Talk, the monthly podcast from Wealth DFM, we welcome Nick Millington, Head of Systematic Index Solutions within the Quantitative Investment Solutions team at Aberdeen. Nick joins us to discuss the Enhanced Index approach, and what is driving its demand. We’re all too familiar with the distinction between passive and active investment approach, but there is another way. This month, we’re looking at Enhanced Index investing, which blends the strengths of both.
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.