HeyJaredWayne Winegarden
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 7
- Latest publication
- Sep 29, 2026
- Outlet visibility, for The Daily Breeze
- Top 500K sites
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 9, 2026
Latest articles
Making income tax surcharge permanent will hurt California (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Would you move to Florida for $100,000 a year? Because of California’s steeply progressive income tax rates, that’s the question many are asking. For an increasing number of taxpayers, the answer has become yes — which is why Proposition 3 is so consequential. In 2012, voters approved Proposition 30, which “temporarily” raised the top personal income tax rates from 9.3% to as high as 12.3%. Proposition 3 would make these surcharges permanent. Proponents argue, why not extend them? The rates only
Opinion: Making income tax surcharge permanent with Prop. 3 hurts state (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Would you move to Florida for $100,000 a year? Because of California’s steeply progressive income tax rates, that’s the question many are asking. For an increasing number of taxpayers, the answer has become yes — which is why Proposition 3 is so consequential. In 2012, voters approved Proposition 30, which “temporarily” raised the top personal income tax rates from 9.3% to as high as 12.3%. Proposition 3 would make these surcharges permanent. Proponents argue, why not extend them? The rates only
State and federal economic policies are making Californians poorer (opens the original)
Read excerpt
President Reagan famously quipped that “Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.” Though made four decades ago, these remarks have become pertinent once again. For Californians, federal and state politicians and regulators have been failing us for several decades now. These failings are driving the economic malaise hanging over the state. To see why, let’s start with tax
Opinion: Key promises made about AB 32 were sweeping — and wrong (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Californians don’t need to read climate legislation to know something has changed over the past two decades. They see it every time they pay their electric bill, fill up the gas tank, or wonder why so many employers and jobs are leaving the state. Next month will mark the 20th anniversary of the enactment of AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. At the time, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger proclaimed that Californians didn’t need to choose between protecting the environment and
After 20 years, can California admit AB 32 failed? (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Californians don’t need to read climate legislation to know something has changed over the past two decades. They see it every time they pay their electric bill, fill up the gas tank, or wonder why so many employers and jobs are leaving the state. Next month will mark the 20th anniversary of the enactment of Assembly Bill 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. At the time, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger proclaimed that Californians didn’t need to choose between protecting the envir
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
Top 500K sites
For The Daily Breeze, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.