Skip to content
HeyJared

Thinking LSAT

Ben Olson and Nathan Fox started the Thinking LSAT Podcast to become better LSAT teachers and have some fun. Please 1) subscribe, 2) rate and review, and 3) send us questions: help@thinkinglsat.com. Don't pay for law school!Learn more at lsatdemon.com

Podcast · By Nathan Fox and Ben Olson · English · Official site

Indexed episodes, last 90 days
10
Latest publication
Sep 7, 2026
Audience
Checking…
Earliest in this view
Jul 6, 2026

Latest episodes

  1. Episode · Sep 7, 2026

    Apply Broadly for Big Bucks (Ep. 575) (opens the original)

    Episode notes · Positive tone

    Read excerpt

    A listener writes in hopes to land the best possible scholarship for a law school in New York City. Ben and Nathan's advice: cast a wide net, apply to every school in the city, and lead with your best LSAT score. Also in this episode: - August LSAT score release day celebrations from the Demon Discord - A student whose score hold finally got released - What's the Deal with... University of Georgia Paul Campos’s Article: Is Your Law School Going Broke: A Field Guide for Interested Parties Study w

  2. Episode · Aug 31, 2026

    Big Law Feeding Frenzy (Ep. 574) (opens the original)

    Episode notes · Positive tone

    Read excerpt

    Big law firms are extending offers to first-year law students before Christmas, pushing the recruiting timeline earlier than ever. Ben and Nathan break down what's driving the frenzy, whether it echoes the pre-2008 hiring bubble, and what it means for applicants counting on those $235K Big Law salaries. Also in this episode: - LSAC postpones removing dual-enrollment credits from applicants’ UGPAs - Advice from Demon students who crushed the LSAT - Early decision scholarships from Wake Forest Law

  3. Episode · Aug 24, 2026

    The 170 Median Race (Ep. 573) (opens the original)

    Episode notes · Neutral tone

    Read excerpt

    Law schools are releasing LSAT and GPA medians for their incoming first-year classes, and the number of schools with a 170+ median has risen sharply since 2016. Ben and Nathan break down why this is happening, and why it means schools are handing out generous scholarships to applicants with high medians. Their advice: use this to your advantage. Also in this episode: - Should you apply early with a below-target LSAT score, or wait until the next cycle? - Switching to Demon after grinding through

  4. Episode · Aug 17, 2026

    175 Is the New 173 (Ep. 572) (opens the original)

    Episode notes · Neutral tone

    Read excerpt

    LSAC has released its annual LSAT percentile table, showing how score distributions have changed over the past three testing cycles. Ben and Nathan explain that while more test takers are earning higher scores, small changes in percentiles matter far less than the score improvement students can make. Also in this episode: - The difference between necessary vs. sufficient questions - Why applying early without your best score will hurt your application - A tip from a student in the LSAT Demon Dis

  5. Episode · Aug 10, 2026

    This GPA Change Could Help You (Ep. 571) (opens the original)

    Episode notes · Positive tone

    Read excerpt

    LSAC has changed how it calculates an applicant's undergraduate GPA: college courses taken during high school will no longer count toward the UGPA. Ben and Nathan discuss how this could benefit many applicants and how students can get their UGPA updated. Also in this episode: - A viewer who is applying to law school for the third time - Washington cancelling their bar exam after technical difficulties - The next contestant on the Personal Statement Gong Show Study with our Free Plan⁠ ⁠Download o

Publishing over time

Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.

Recurring subjects

Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.

Audience

No verified audience measurement yet.

About this data

Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.

Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.

See coverage about Thinking LSAT