The Make Music Income Podcast
In this weekly podcast, composer, arranger, and producer Eric Copeland of Make Music Income talks about his continuing journey to Make Music Income with Music Licensing, Music Production, Music Publishing, Sheet Music, Artist Income, Online Channel Income, and more.
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 2
- Latest publication
- Jul 27, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 13, 2026
Latest episodes
EP172. Only 2 Ways to Make Music Income: Active & Passive | Celebrating 5 Years of Make Music Income (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Hey it’s our 5th Anniversary on Make Music Income and we’re celebrating with some announcements and a special video that goes all the way back to our first one 5 years ago this month! If you are looking to make music AND make income from the music you make, well we are going to talk about ALL the ways. So buckle up for this LIVE podcast. #musiclicensing #musicincome #musicroyalties #musicteaching #churchmusic #passiveincome #musicartists WORK WITH ME: Work directly with composer and producer Eri
EP171. The Road to $50K Per Quarter in Sync | Wolfgang's Story (opens the original)
Read excerpt
If you have watched this channel, especially my live videos you know the name “Wolfgang Wohrle.” Wolfgang is a German composer who recently had his largest quarterly PRO quarter with BMI directly and only from sync licensing. But Wolfgang didn’t go viral. He didn’t have a hit song. He spent years writing production music, starting in stock music libraries, got discovered by a BMG library, and now almost exactly 5 years later, his PRO royalties exceeded $50,000 in a single quarter. #musiclicensin
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.