The Jeffrey and Brian Show
We have been doing this show on and off for years. We are getting better!
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 10
- Latest publication
- Sep 7, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 4, 2026
Latest episodes
Don’t let Bobcats in your House! (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Jeffrey and Brian formally introduced episode 349 and briefly discussed alcohol-sales rules in West Virginia and Virginia. They then examined Michigan municipal restrictions on pride flags and the reported allowance for an Iranian flag on government buildings, using the issue to debate diversity, religious governance, and LGBTQ+ policy. Jeffrey raised Tyler Robinson’s legal strategy and said he had not realized Robinson was seeking to avoid trial rather than only remove the death penalty. The sp
Are You Stupid? (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Participants debated how claims of gender equality intersect with differences in physical strength and the legal or social expectations surrounding violence between men and women. The discussion then shifted briefly to Brian McFadden’s age and whether he had ever been punched in the face. The team discussed criticism of New York City Mayor Mamdani for expressing sympathy toward the family of an accused killer, then reviewed lawsuits challenging proposed government grocery stores on civil-rights
Fossil Fuels Great for the Planet (opens the original)
Read excerpt
The hosts discussed a reported DHS list of judges viewed as hostile to Trump and debated whether identifying them publicly amounted to doxxing. They then shifted to suppressor rules and possible restoration of gun rights for people with nonviolent felony convictions. The discussion focused on the Kennedy Center’s board, judicial interventions, potential renovations, and the significance of Trump’s name on the building. The hosts then debated “Trump derangement syndrome,” antisemitism, nationalis
You Can’t Tax my Silencers (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Jeffrey and Brian recalled an incident involving Cornell students who butchered a bear in a dormitory community kitchen. They said Cornell subsequently created policies prohibiting similar conduct and briefly discussed the quality and preparation of bear meat. Testecleese described a lawsuit brought by 13 states challenging federal National Firearms Act requirements. The discussion focused on the argument that a tax stamp is unjustified when the underlying tax is zero, while the participants not
No Rations for You! (opens the original)
Read excerpt
The conversation moved to a court ruling about installing a ballroom in the White House, with participants questioning whether such renovations require Congressional approval and noting perceived partisan enforcement. They discussed which chambers must pass measures for such changes and how political alignment influences enforcement. Participants discussed the Smithsonian director’s social-media remarks conflicting with Senate testimony and the potential for contempt proceedings. They referenced
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.