HeyJaredThe Gobeski/Wallace Report Podcast
Straight from the mouths of Adam Gobeski and Charlie Wallace: two great minds, one great podcast! Subjects of discussion include (but are not limited to): movies, music, television, video games, lesser known holiday traditions, people we dislike, getting Jason to do things…
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 3
- Latest publication
- Sep 7, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Aug 3, 2026
Latest episodes
Episode 321 - Bond Voyage Appendix A1: Casino Royale (1954) (opens the original)
Read excerpt
What better way to start a project than with the appendix! We kick off Bond Voyage, our new James Bond movie march. We start with the 1954 episode of the TV show "Climax" entitled "Casino Royale". If you've ever wondered what an American James Bond would be like, look no further. Charlie and Alex give a little lesson on baccarat, but it won't improve your chances of winning!
Episode 320 - Boring Childhood Memories (opens the original)
Read excerpt
We get the gang together to celebrate - Alex has finally seen a movie in an actual THEATER! Paul reaches deep into his childhood memories to spoil a movie we've never heard of. And of course there is only one segment that MUST happen every time Alex is on the podcast. You won't be disappointed (but Charlie will).
Episode 319 - The Zipper Merge of Time (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Tony is podcasting from a new city, and his table doesn't have legs. It's ok though - it's hard to be in a bad mood when you're discussing June birthdays! And rest assured: by the end of the episodes you'll be able to tell your Jimothys from your Timothys.
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.