The Daly Dose with Mike Daly
The Daly Dose is a collection of Scripture-centered Bible studies and theological teaching. I began recording these talks to supplement my weekly in-person Bible study nights—so they could be accessed, revisited, or shared more easily.
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 2
- Latest publication
- Sep 30, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Sep 25, 2026
Latest episodes
#19 Reading Genesis Well — Part 2 of 8: Why Is Genesis Told This Way? (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Genesis 1 doesn’t simply tell us that God created. The story is carefully arranged—with repeated phrases, correspondingdays, changes in pace, and a surprising amount of attention given to humanity and God’s rest. In Part 2 of Reading Genesis Well , we ask why Genesis tells the creation story this way. Rather than treating its structure as incidental, we look at what the patterns may be emphasizing about the character of God, humanity’s calling within creation, and where the creation account is u
#18 Reading Genesis Well — Part 1 of 8: Reading Genesis with Fresh Eyes (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Genesis 1 is one of the most familiar passages in the Bible—but familiarity can sometimes cause us to read from memory instead of noticing what is actually on the page. In this first study of an eight-part series through Genesis 1–11, we slow down and read the creation account with fresh eyes, paying attention to repetition, structure, patterns, and the way the story is told. Rather than beginning with questions about the age of the earth or the length of the creation days, we begin with a simpl
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Not enough subject data for this period yet.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.