HeyJaredThe Cricket Drop
The Cricket Drop is UK journalist James Rodger's newsletter on cricket on the pitch, the business of the sport off it, and its future too - whether it be Test, ODI or T20.
- Indexed issues, last 90 days
- 13
- Latest publication
- Sep 30, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 15, 2026
Latest issues
The Cricket Drop 🏏 #78 - Made his Mark (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Good morning, cricket fans. Welcome to this week’s Cricket Drop - edition number 78 - on Wednesday, September 30.Today’s headlines 🏏<img alt="" class="sizing-normal" height="836" src="htt
The Cricket Drop 🏏 #77 - Three-way title fight (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Good morning, cricket fans. Welcome to this week’s Cricket Drop - edition number 77 - on Wednesday, September 23.Today’s headlines 🏏<img alt="" class="sizing-normal" height="817" src="htt
The Cricket Drop 🏏 #76 - England Test summer report card (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Good morning, cricket fans. Welcome to this week’s Cricket Drop - edition number 76 - on Wednesday, September 16.Today’s headlines 🏏<img alt="" class="sizing-normal" height="810" src="htt
The Cricket Drop 🏏 #75 - At what cost? (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Good morning, cricket fans. Welcome to this week’s Cricket Drop - edition number 75 - on Wednesday, September 9.Today’s headlines 🏏<img alt="" class="sizing-normal" height="906" src="http
The Cricket Drop 🏏 #74 - Sharp Tongue (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Good morning, cricket fans. Welcome to this week’s Cricket Drop - edition number 74 - on Wednesday, September 2.Today’s headlines 🏏<img alt="" class="sizing-normal" height="810" src="http
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.