The Construction Leading Edge Podcast
This podcast is dedicated to helping construction business owners eliminate chaos, maximize profit, and reclaim their freedom.Designed for leaders who are ready to step out of the daily grind and take control of their business, The Construction Leading Edge Podcast delivers…
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 2
- Latest publication
- Sep 21, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Sep 14, 2026
Latest episodes
Why Generic Business Coaching Never Works for Your Construction Company | Ep. 462 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Kris Miller runs a commercial, multifamily, and residential construction company in Denver, and he is on his way to cutting his workweek from 80 hours down to 10. In this episode, he shares the construction business systems that got him moving, from a simple weekly client update to an accountability chart that finally put the right people in the right seats. ⚡Schedule a Business Evaluation Call with The Construction Leading Edge Team: HERE 👉 For years, Kris and his two partners treated the rough
How to Turn Customer & Employee Excuses Into Action | Ep. 461 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Every construction business owner hears the same objections: now isn't a good time, this will take too long, and it's too big to tackle. In this episode, Todd Dawalt breaks down the three excuses that keep customers and employees from taking action, and the calibrated questions that get them to move. ⚡Schedule a Business Evaluation Call with The Construction Leading Edge Team: HERE 👉 If you run a construction company, you already know the moment. A prospect tells you now just isn't a good time,
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.