The American Legal History Podcast
This podcast will trace the history and evolution of American law from its most ancient roots, through the birth of the common law in medieval England, early colonial and revolutionary American, through the early days of the supreme court, the civil war, through the…
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 2
- Latest publication
- Sep 18, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Aug 1, 2026
Latest episodes
Episode Thirty-Eight: American Law in the Gilded Age, Part I (opens the original)
Read excerpt
In this the first of three episodes on American law in the Gilded Age, we will examine American law after the Civil War. Specifically in regard to the rise of truely national coporations, the plight of industrial workers and farmes, a mode of opinion writing known as clasical legal thought, and the recrafting of the Fourteenth Amedment by the Supreme Court for the benefit of property and business interests. We will also take a close look at the first important case concerning the Fourteenth Amen
Episode Thirty-Seven: Before the Movement: The Hidden History of Black Civil Rights, Part II (opens the original)
Read excerpt
In Part II of my interview with Professor Dylan C. Penningroth, author of Before the Movement: The Hidden History of Black Civil Rights, we will discuss the three categories of rights as they were understood in the 1860's; how and why access to the law of everyday life was so important in the lives of former slaves; the little-understood phenomenon of the rise in Black property ownership in the South after the Civil War; the surprising relationship of African Americans and local courts in the So
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.