The Agentic Revenue Brief Podcast
🎙️ The Agentic Revenue Brief Podcast | Hosted by Tim CortinovisWelcome to The Agentic Revenue Brief Podcast — where the future of revenue organizations is not discussed… it is decoded.This podcast evolved from The Sales Accelerator, but the game has changed.We are no longer…
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 2
- Latest publication
- Sep 18, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Sep 11, 2026
Latest episodes
Agentic AI’s Inflection Point: Governance, Orchestration, and the New Revenue Playbook (opens the original)
Read excerpt
In this episode of The Agentic Revenue Brief, Tim Cortinovis breaks down a major shift in agentic AI: the conversation is no longer about launching more agents, but about building governed, vertical, outcome-driven systems that can safely influence revenue. From rogue-agent risks and action-level permissions to multi-agent orchestration and AI visibility as a demand channel, this episode helps revenue leaders understand what actually changed this week—and what to do next. Why you should listen #
Who’s Watching the Agents? The New Revenue Risk in Agentic AI (opens the original)
Read excerpt
What happens when AI agents stop assisting and start acting? In this week’s Agentic Revenue Brief, Tim Cortinovis breaks down the inflection point every revenue leader needs to understand: agent control is no longer just a technical concern — it’s a board-level revenue, compliance, and brand risk. From OpenAI’s “wiki incident” to Salesforce baking Agentforce into CRM pricing, Docusign automating the last mile to signed revenue, and ChatGPT being regulated as search infrastructure in Europe, this
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.