Skip to content
HeyJared

The 80/20 Principle

This podcast is for lawyers who want more freedom, flexibility, and control over their practice. Ernie focuses on the 20% of tools and strategies—especially AI—that deliver 80% of the results.No buzzwords. No hype.

Podcast · By Ernie Svenson · English · Official site

Indexed episodes, last 90 days
5
Latest publication
Sep 29, 2026
Audience
Checking…
Earliest in this view
Jul 21, 2026

Latest episodes

  1. Episode · Sep 29, 2026

    333: Why AI feels more like email than the web (opens the original)

    Episode notes

    Read excerpt

    In this episode, Ernie Svenson talks with Greg Siskind, who has practiced immigration law for 35 years and wrote a book about marketing on the internet back in 1996, when that was a peculiar thing for a lawyer to do. Greg says AI reminds him of email more than any other technology wave he's lived through — the web, the cloud, and social media each changed a slice of legal work, while email changed the day-to-day job itself. They talk about the drafting shift that surprised him most, a 25-page vi

  2. Episode · Sep 15, 2026

    332: The role your firm needs but can't name (opens the original)

    Episode notes

    Read excerpt

    A few weeks ago, one of Sarah Persich's clients dropped an AI agent into their Slack workspace. Sarah gave it the criteria her client's intake team is supposed to follow on calls — build rapport, handle objections, gather the right information — and asked it to listen to the recorded calls and grade every person against those criteria. It came back ten minutes later with work that would have taken weeks by hand. The tool is Viktor . We spend a good chunk of this episode on it, because it runs in

  3. Episode · Sep 1, 2026

    331: When AI Starts to Look Like Judgment (with Carolyn Elefant) (opens the original)

    Episode notes

    Read excerpt

    Carolyn Elefant has been practicing law for thirty-five years and writing about solo practice for almost as long. In this episode she and Ernie get into how AI is changing litigation — not in theory, but in the cases she's handling right now. Carolyn walks through experiments she's run and posted publicly, including having AI draft the judge's opinion from both briefs before she wrote her reply, and hiding instructions inside a brief to see which AI tools would follow them. One tool refused. One

  4. Episode · Aug 18, 2026

    330: Why Claude Gets Dumber—and How Lawyers Can Use AI Better (opens the original)

    Episode notes · Neutral tone

    Read excerpt

    In this episode, Ernie Svenson talks with Docket Drafter co-founder Tommy Eberle about what lawyers need to understand to use AI tools like Claude more effectively. They unpack why Word documents consume so many tokens, why AI performance can decline during long chats, how context windows and compaction affect results, and when to use different Claude models and thinking levels. Tommy also explains how lawyers can use AI to organize files, automate repetitive document work, and build more effici

  5. Episode · Jul 21, 2026

    329: Introduction to Claude and Its Potential (opens the original)

    Episode notes · Positive tone

    Read excerpt

    Most lawyers using Claude are only scratching the surface of what it can do. In this episode, Ernie Svenson talks with former litigator and software founder Nick Chapleau about using Claude as more than a chatbot—as a chief of staff that can help run a modern law firm. They explore email triage, workflow automation, firm knowledge bases, custom dashboards, security, and what it takes to build a truly Claude-native practice. Chapters 0:05 Using Claude as Chief of Staff 2:34 Nick's Legal and Softw

Publishing over time

Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.

Recurring subjects

Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.

Audience

No verified audience measurement yet.

About this data

Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.

Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.

See coverage about The 80/20 Principle