Supercoach Co-Captains Podcast
Join Daneo and Patto as they talk all things AFL Supercoach.
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 6
- Latest publication
- Aug 17, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 7, 2026
Latest episodes
AFL Supercoach - ROUND 24 - Grand Final Time (opens the original)
Read excerpt
We're out of trades and it's SC Grand Final Time!!! Strap in and the boys go over the fast finishers for 2026, as well as discuss the random injuries (among other weird things that may result in suspensions). The boys also go over the VC & C options for your GF week of round 24.
AFL Supercoach - ROUND 23 - The Nasiah Has Fallen (opens the original)
Read excerpt
NAS has fallen, he ain't coming back in 3 days, so if you have trades who do you trade him to? The boizzzz talk this, as well as VC and C options for Round 23. Good luck in finals!!
AFL Supercoach - ROUND 21 - We Cooked (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Callaghan is down and out, some others have illness, some have old man back injuries, and we out of trades. Tune into this chaotic AF speed run edition. As usual VC and C options for Round 21. Good luck in SC FINALS!!!
AFL Supercoach - ROUND 20 - This Holmes In A Shambles (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Another one bites the dust, big Max Holmes is DOWN for the season. Who to trade him to plus more is discussed this poddy, as well as the usual VC and C options for Round 20.
AFL Supercoach - ROUND 19 - Not Butters (opens the original)
Read excerpt
More carnage - Zak Butters is done. But, who to bring in? Also, Brad Hill - BUY BUY BUY! This and more are discussed in this poddy, along with the usual VC and C options for round 19.
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.