So You Work in Aged Care
Dr. Julie Bajic Smith (PhD) is an award winning Aged Care Psychology Consultant. After completing her doctorate focusing on the wellbeing of home care workers she continues to research, publish and support the frontline workforce through a range of educational programs.The…
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 2
- Latest publication
- Sep 28, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Aug 12, 2026
Latest episodes
Episode 78: The Emotional Labour, What We Don’t Talk About (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Episode 78: The Emotional Labour, What We Don't Talk About Just because it’s invisible doesn’t mean it’s not exhausting. In this episode, Julie explores the emotional labour behind care, service and wellbeing roles — the quiet, unseen work of listening, absorbing, regulating and showing up with empathy even when depleted. She names the invisible load many people carry and offers grounded strategies to protect emotional energy, honour boundaries and recognise emotional labour as real work with re
Episode 77: Owning Change with Clarity and Courage (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Episode 77: Owning Change with Clarity and Courage Transitions aren’t detours. They’re the path. In this episode, Julie explores what it means to navigate change with clarity, courage and compassion. Drawing from her own lived transitions — evolving beyond aged care, reshaping Wise Care, and balancing family, leadership and committee roles — she offers a grounded, human perspective on identity shifts and the emotional complexity of growth. This conversation reframes transitions as essential path
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Not enough subject data for this period yet.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.