Sleuth Studies: The Hardy Boys Podcast
In 2027, the Hardy Boys celebrates its centennial anniversary: one hundred years of mysteries solved, crooks caught, and justice returned. But not without some adventures, of course!Pull up a chair. Grab a drink.
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 2
- Latest publication
- Aug 29, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 31, 2026
Latest episodes
Episode 12: The Hardy Boys and Knowledge Mobilization with Darryl de Dios (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Knowledge mobilization. What is it? Why does it matter? And how exactly does it relate to the Hardy Boys? Let’s find out together, my friends. In this episode, Sleuth Studies: The Hardy Boys Podcast welcomes the wonderful Darryl de Dios for a—very meta conversation about knowledge mobilization. Together, we’ll use knowledge mobilization as a concept to explore what knowledge mobilization really is—breaking it down so we can use it to explore the Hardy Boys, children’s literature, and the world o
Episode 11: The Hardy Boys and the Boy Detective with Mimi Okabe (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Is it important that the Hardy Boys are boy detectives? It matters, my friends. I promise. But don’t just take it from me! Sleuth Studies: The Hardy Boys podcast is excited to welcome the incredible Mimi Okabe, professor, academic, and detective fiction researcher. In this episode, Mimi joins us for a fascinating discussion on all things boy detective—her specialty. Join us as together, we establish why the distinction between adult and youth detectives is important, why the boy detective as a c
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Not enough subject data for this period yet.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.