HeyJaredrj's trading for dickheads
simple, practical, idiot-proof trading stuff that makes money
- Indexed issues, last 90 days
- 4
- Latest publication
- Sep 21, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 15, 2026
Latest issues
my spidey senses are tingling (opens the original)
Read excerpt
gm gmas your attorney, i suggest you read this right now.rj's trading for dickheads is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
a simple, crazy-effective, calendar effect trade in macro etfs (opens the original)
Read excerpt
i like calendar effects.trades exploiting calendar effects tend to be easy to understand, easy to test, and (usually) easy to execute.they don’t need complicated models or hundreds of inputs.to trade them, you often just need to know the time and date.. . .simple things ain’t necessarily easy though. finding tradeable calendar effects isn’t a data mining problem. you need to dig deeper to cause and effect.. . .in this article, i’m going to show you exactly how to do that.we’re going to start wit
a truly idiotic crypto trade (opens the original)
Read excerpt
g’daytoday we’re going to talk about edges that appear due to other traders’ stupidity.i’m going to show you a crypto trade that is so silly you might not believe it. but i promise you it’s real.<img alt="" class="siz
a gentleman's guide to trading numbers days (opens the original)
Read excerpt
gm gmmost of the times asset prices are about as likely to go down as they are to go up.most things it’s possible to know and trade on legally are known and traded on by others. so asset prices usually exist in a kinda noisy drifty equilibrium.. . .important new information does appear though. and unexpected bad news tends make number go down more than unexpected good news tends to make number go up.that’s basically taleb’s whole schitck. and he’s not wrong. it’s just that it’s well known and un
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.