Recycle: Don't Be A Waster!
In our weekly episodes of Recycle: Don't Be A Waster! - we talk about all things recycling, environment and waste industry related. We really believe that there are lots of simple recycling improvements that people can easily make - if they simply know the facts.
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 2
- Latest publication
- Aug 14, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 27, 2026
Latest episodes
The Future of Recycling: Will We Only Need One Bin? (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Could AI, robotics and smarter recycling facilities make our growing collection of recycling bins obsolete? We look 20 years into the future and ask whether machines will become far better at sorting our rubbish than we are. What will recycling look like in 15 or 20 years? Right now, Australia seems to be heading towards more and more bins. General waste, mixed recycling, FOGO, glass and other specialist waste streams increasingly require households and businesses to do the sorting themselves. B
Why Are My Recycling and General Waste Bins Emptied Into the Same Truck? (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Have you ever seen a commercial recycling bin and a general waste bin emptied into the same truck and assumed that none of it was actually being recycled? In this episode of Recycle: Don't Be A Waster , we explain why that isn't necessarily true. We discuss why waste companies are actually financially incentivised to recover recyclable materials rather than send them to landfill, how modern Materials Recovery Facilities (MRFs) separate valuable resources using advanced technology, and why dry co
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Not enough subject data for this period yet.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.