Program Evaluation
This substack focuses on new and classic thinking in program evaluation from the perspective of a full-time evaluator of human services programs.
- Indexed issues, last 90 days
- 2
- Latest publication
- Sep 13, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 6, 2026
Latest issues
Essentials of Deliberative Democratic Evaluation: Inclusion (opens the original)
Read excerpt
In this three-part series I’m going to provide an explanation of the three most important concepts in democratic evaluation, calling back to the best text this school of evaluation produced Values in Evaluation and Social Research by Ernest House and Kenneth Howe (1999).1 As the title implies this text is not only useful for evaluators but for anyone who conducts or uses social science research. House and Howe state the requirements of deliberative democratic evaluation clearly:<s
On Agreeing with AI (opens the original)
Read excerpt
The phenomenon of humans and AI agreeing with each other has already received abundant commentary under the header of sycophancy, which is what happens when AI appears to bend its judgment to support the ideas of whomever it is currently talking to. However, a paper recently crossed my desk that got me thinking about what is arguably a much bigger problem with human-AI agreement. Like most big issues in AI, this one seems to be more of a human problem than a technical one. The problem is that we
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.