HeyJaredNishith Desai Associates
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 4
- Latest publication
- Sep 24, 2026
- Outlet visibility, for Legally India
- Top 500K sites
- Earliest in this view
- Sep 11, 2026
Latest articles
End of bumpy ride for Uber? CCI smoothens the road (opens the original)
Read excerpt
The Competition Commission of India (“Commission”) in In Re: Meru Travel Solutions (Private) Ltd v Uber India Systems (Private) Ltd.1 (“Uber Order”) held that Uber India did not hold a dominant position within the city of Kolkata and therefore no case could be made out for directing an investigation by the Director General for abuse of dominant position. The Commission rejected allegations that Uber was held a dominant position in the marlet for as the evidence put on record did not justify the
Delhi HC analysis: No valid arbitration if clause in unsigned agreement (opens the original)
Read excerpt
The Delhi High Court (“Court”) in the case of Virgoz Oils and Fats Pte. Ltd. (“Vigoz”) v National Agricultural Marketing Federation of India 1(“NAFED”) has refused the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award after allowing an objection to its enforcement under Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“The Act”). The Court has referred to and relied upon the requirements set out under the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Awards, 1958 (“The Convention”) and the Act
India and Cyprus Sign Revised Tax Treaty (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Recently, India and Cyprus have signed a revised agreement for the avoidance of double taxation and fiscal evasion (“Revised Treaty”). The Revised Treaty is the outcome of prolonged and extensive negotiations. While the text of the Revised Treaty has recently been published in the Cyprus Gazette,1 the Indian Government is yet to make the text of the Revised Treaty public. However, the Indian government has recently announced the signing of the Revised Treaty by way of a press note dated November
Proceedings against Bharti Airtel for non- deduction of tax barred by limitation (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Recently, the Delhi High Court in the case of Bharti Airtel Ltd. and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.1 held that proceedings in relation to non-deduction of tax at source on payments made to non-resident entities is barred by limitation which should be set at 4 years. Bharti Airtel Limited (“Taxpayer”), a resident Indian entity, had engaged non-resident entities for providing services in relation to inter-connections. In doing so, some charges were accrued - which were paid by the Taxpayer to tho
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
Top 500K sites
For Legally India, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.