NIH Collaboratory
The NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory Podcast provides a platform for discussions about interesting and timely issues in the field of pragmatic clinical trials.
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 3
- Latest publication
- Sep 22, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 30, 2026
Latest episodes
Podcast 67: Designing Fit-for-Purpose ePCTs (opens the original)
Read excerpt
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) Director Wendy Weber and NIH Collaboratory co-PI Adrian Hernandez discuss fit-for-purpose trials and what researchers need to consider during the design phase. This discussion sets the stage for the NIH Collaboratory's 4-part educational podcast series, "Laying the Foundation for Successful Pragmatic Trials." Access resources related to this episode: https://dcricollab.dcri.duke.edu/sites/NIHKR/KR/Podcast%20Episode%201%20Resources.
Podcast 66: Bringing Context and Clarity to Clinical Trial Research with JAMA+ Trials (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Alison Huang and Derek Angus of JAMA+ Trials expand on key takeaways from their recent Grand Rounds presentation, “Bringing Context and Clarity to Clinical Trial Research for Clinician and Public Health Audiences.”
Podcast 65: Slow Recruitment Mitigation Strategies (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Drs. Steven George and Christine Goertz discuss slow recruitment mitigation strategies, one of the small group discussion topics at the NIH Pragmatic Trial Collaboratory's Steering Committee meeting in April 2026. Review the Steering Committee Meeting materials: https://rethinkingclinicaltrials.org/news/april-2026-annual-steering-committee-meeting/
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.