Monsters in the Morning
Chicago sports talk weekly round up featuring Maniac Mike and Touchdown Charley.
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 3
- Latest publication
- Sep 9, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 19, 2026
Latest episodes
MITM #285 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Hold onto your trunks! Just when you thought the summer season was over - oh no there’s more! More fun in the sun, more good time bike rides, more quality time with Papa and Nanni, more beer, more buns, more foam, more fun. So buckle up friends cause there’s a block party in the midst and the DJ is playing very loud and extremely close! May I have this dance?
MITM #284 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
We humans are complex creatures. We eat when we may be full. We buy things we may not be able to afford. And, yes we sometimes even hurt those we love the most. Why? Why do we constantly make the same mistakes day after day after day after day. When does it end? What can we do to be better people? Now where these may be unanswerable questions, downright scary to even ponder - rest assured that there is a light that may, just may, help guide you in your pursuit towards equanimity and peace. And d
MITM #283 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Check in and check out what’s happening in the wide and wondrous world of Monsters in the Morning by tuning into the Official Companion Podcast of everyone’s favorite sports aficionados. Giving you behind the scenes insight, fan call ins, and non stop churning of the rumor mill, this new and exciting podcast just may be your newest fav guilty pleasure. So what you waiting for?!
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Not enough subject data for this period yet.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.