HeyJaredMarket Perspectives with Don Calcagni
In this podcast series, Don Calcagni, Chief Investment Officer, provides a data driven, common sense perspective on the economy, markets, and investing.
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 5
- Latest publication
- Sep 17, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 30, 2026
Latest episodes
Episode 41 - Making Sense of Rising Treasury Yields (opens the original)
Read excerpt
David Krakauer, VP of Portfolio Management, examines the economic forces that have pushed long-term Treasury yields to the highest level in nearly two decades — and why investors shouldn't be alarmed.
Episode 40 - Diversify Broadly, Both Across and Within Global Asset Classes (opens the original)
Read excerpt
CIO Don Calcagni explains why he pursues the broadest possible diversification in portfolios — and why it's the second principle of the evidence-based investment philosophy at Mercer Advisors.
Episode 39 - Financial Planning Is a Prerequisite to Successful Investing (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Don Calcagni, Chief Investment Officer, breaks down why financial planning should be the essential first step to building, sustaining, and transferring wealth.
Episode 38 - The Science of Investing (opens the original)
Read excerpt
CIO Don Calcagni unpacks why active investing underperforms, why indexing is a smart start, and how factor investing can improve your long-term returns.
Episode 37 - Navigating the Mega-IPOs (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Mercer Advisors CIO Don Calcagni explains why most investors should resist IPO hype, stay diversified, and let index inclusion work for them over time.
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.