Skip to content
HeyJared

Law://WhatsNext

How are leading legal practitioners leveraging emerging technologies and ways of working to pursue their passion and objectives, and as a by product what are the implications for the future of the profession? Let’s explore this together.

Newsletter · By Tom Rice · Official site

Indexed issues, last 90 days
2
Latest publication
Sep 29, 2026
Audience
Checking…
Earliest in this view
Sep 11, 2026

Latest issues

  1. Issue · Sep 29, 2026

    Thinking Fast: Chris Bridges on Jev and the Rise of “System One” AI (opens the original)

    Excerpt · Positive tone

    Read excerpt

    Welcome to the first episode of Season 3 of Law://WhatsNext!A quick reminder: Law://WhatsNext is our vehicle to explore through dialogue (or occasional reflection) how leading lawyers, educators and technologists are using emerging tech to evolve how we practice and administer legal services. No hype — just practical conversations.We’re excited to be back, and to bring you a run of interesting conversations this autumn (or fall, depending on which side of the Atlantic you’re on).This month, <a h

  2. Issue · Sep 11, 2026

    Legal tech’s moat isn’t the UI (opens the original)

    Excerpt

    Read excerpt

    The following article was originally published by our good friend David Bushby (Head of Legal Ops at Canva) through InCounsel Weekly (his bite sized weekly newsletter well worth your time and attention) and builds on some of the ideas and trends we enjoyed getting into earlier this year on our podcast (one of our most popular episodes to date).David’s challenge to how legal tech companies position and evolve th

Publishing over time

Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.

Recurring subjects

Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.

Audience

No verified audience measurement yet.

About this data

Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.

Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.

See coverage about Law://WhatsNext