HeyJaredJCEHP Emerging Best Practices in CPD
Official podcast series from The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions (JCEHP).
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 3
- Latest publication
- Sep 9, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 9, 2026
Latest episodes
Knowledge, Power, and Technology: A Narrative Review of Knowledge-Sharing in Project ECHO (opens the original)
Read excerpt
This narrative review joins an ongoing scholarly conversation about Project ECHO, a virtual educational innovation, with an aim to understand it as a technology-enabled interface that facilitates knowledge-sharing. Critical attention is paid to how dynamics of power are accounted for in the deployment of Project ECHO, and sociomaterial attention is paid to how communication technology is described. The review is relevant to those who wish to establish, understand, or further develop virtual mult
Improved Activity Evaluations: An Iterative Process Using the Rasch Model (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Introduction: Traditional evaluation models, often linear and outcome-focused, are increasingly inadequate for the complexities of modern medical education, which demands more comprehensive and nuanced assessment approaches. Methods: A standardized continuing professional development activity evaluation instrument was developed and implemented. An iterative process was performed, using a repeat Rasch analysis, to improve reliability of the evaluation instrument. Category Probability Curves and T
Publishing Qualitative Research in the Journal for Continuing Education in the Health Professions: A Guide for Authors (opens the original)
Read excerpt
A qualitative study exploring how nurses adapt to electronic health records is submitted to a journal. The reviewers agree the topic is timely and the interviews are rich, but the article is returned with a request for major revisions. Why? The research questions are vague, the sampling strategy is unclear, and the analytic process is summarized in a single sentence. The rejection note concludes: "Important work, but insufficiently rigorous." Qualitative research offers the field of continuing e
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.