Japan Times Business
Japan Times Business is the business and economy-focused vertical of The Japan Times, offering English-language coverage of Japan’s corporate landscape alongside major global economic and policy developments.
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 13
- Latest publication
- Aug 3, 2026
- Audience
- Top 100K sites
- Earliest in this view
- Aug 1, 2026
Latest articles
China draws ‘red lines’ around its economic model ahead of EU and U.S. trade talks (opens the original)
Read excerpt
The West frames China's policies as mercantilist and opposing global trade rules, saying its priority for producers over households pushes cheaper goods into global markets.
Young South Koreans look for jobs in Japan as they struggle to find work at home (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Big-name Korean employers prefer to hire experienced workers, in contrast with Japan where companies are struggling to fill positions in large graduate schemes.
AI and chips are turning Malaysia into Asia’s growth standout (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Malaysia's emergence as an artificial-intelligence manufacturing hub marks a striking turnaround for the country.
Capital One cites money laundering review in Trump-related suit (opens the original)
Read excerpt
The bank said the internal review was triggered by "transaction patterns" that "are among the types of activity flagged by federal banking guidance."
Japan and U.S. confirm joint yen intervention (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Both Tokyo and Washington say they stand ready to intervene again to counter the yen's excessive weakness against the dollar.
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
Top 100K sites
Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.