HeyJaredin-conversation with ...
Is investing in ‘digital’ products, people, and services the best way to future-proof the beauty industry?Or indeed should the industry focus be on ‘sustainable’ products, people, and services?How can companies navigate the new beauty landscape whilst also dealing with the…
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 2
- Latest publication
- Aug 18, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 21, 2026
Latest episodes
Predictive, Protective, Planet-Positive: How Gen Z Is Redefining Beauty for 2026 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
In this episode of In Conversation With, Global Cosmetics News explores how Generation Z is redefining the global cosmetics and personal care industry. Digitally fluent, highly informed and increasingly influential, Gen Z consumers are transforming how beauty products are discovered, researched, evaluated and purchased. Affordability remains important, but this generation also expects performance, ingredient transparency and authentic brand values—often prioritising these factors over hype and c
Predictive, Protective, Planet-Positive: Cosmetics for Gen Alpha (opens the original)
Read excerpt
In this episode of In Conversation With, Global Cosmetics News explores one of the beauty industry's fastest-emerging consumer groups: Generation Alpha. While most Gen Alpha consumers are still children, their growing influence on beauty trends, family purchasing decisions and future brand loyalty is already reshaping the cosmetics industry. From the rise of "Sephora Kids" and growing concerns around cosmeticorexia to the impact of AI, social media and evolving regulation, manufacturers, brands
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.