Skip to content
HeyJared

Historia Nobis by Athelstan Founder

Thoughts and musings on the English medieval, early modern, and British Empire/World War periods. Specific emphasis on the Anglo-Saxon era.

Newsletter · By AthelstanFounder · English · Official site

Indexed issues, last 90 days
11
Latest publication
Sep 27, 2026
Audience
Checking…
Earliest in this view
Jul 4, 2026

Latest issues

  1. Issue · Sep 27, 2026

    Judging the past via the present (opens the original)

    Excerpt

    Read excerpt

    <img alt="BBC Radio 4 - In Our Time, Roman Slavery" class="sizing-normal" height="675" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!l_hx!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb5

  2. Issue · Sep 20, 2026

    Peasants’ Revolt (opens the original)

    Excerpt

    Read excerpt

    <img alt="Peasants' Revolt - Wikipedia" class="sizing-normal" height="489.104" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!2Z57!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F564aa106-29

  3. Issue · Sep 13, 2026

    Black Confederates (opens the original)

    Excerpt

    Read excerpt

    The notion of Black Confederates—tens of thousands of African Americans serving as armed soldiers for the Confederacy—is a modern myth, not a Civil War reality. It emerged in the 1970s, largely from Lost Cause writers, neo‑Confederates, and ultra‑right activists seeking to sanitise the Confederacy’s racial ideology. The claim typically appears in a sensational form: “The South didn’t hate Black people—100,000 Black soldiers fought for the Confederacy!”<div class="you

  4. Issue · Sep 6, 2026

    The Lost Cause... (opens the original)

    Excerpt · Critical tone

    Read excerpt

    The Lost Cause narrative—the claim that the American Civil War was fundamentally not about slavery—rests on a single, fatal flaw: it rejects the basic method of history itself. This is not a matter of competing interpretations or alternative perspectives. It is, quite simply, ahistoric. And when its practitioners are pressed to apply their reasoning consistently, their intellectual dishonesty becomes undeniable.How We Know HistoryHistory is built on primary sources—written and material e

  5. Issue · Aug 30, 2026

    A historical musing (opens the original)

    Excerpt

    Read excerpt

    <img alt="Edward the Confessor - Wikipedia" class="sizing-normal" height="460.38461538461536" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!yk89!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%

Publishing over time

Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.

Recurring subjects

Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.

Audience

No verified audience measurement yet.

About this data

Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.

Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.

See coverage about Historia Nobis by Athelstan Founder