Guildhall Chambers Legal Podcasts
Stay informed with expert insights from one of the UK’s leading barristers’ chambers. Our podcast brings you practical guidance, in-depth analysis, and commentary on the latest developments in law.
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 3
- Latest publication
- Jul 23, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 9, 2026
Latest episodes
Desperately Seeking a Defendant - Presented by Michael Selway and Jessica Sharratt (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Michael Selway and Jessica Sharratt explore CPR r. 19.12, Bourlakova v Bourlakov [2024] EWHC 1937 (Ch) and other options for litigation against an estate without a personal representative.
Motor finance commissions: the latest - Presented by Lucy Walker (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Lucy Walker will provide an update on the latest developments relating to the ongoing saga of motor finance commission, including legal challenges to the proposed Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) redress scheme and the implications for the scheme; attempts by the FCA to control the behaviour of claims management companies (CMCs) and limit group litigation; and the prospect of collateral claims by lenders against CMCs encouraged by the decision in Vanquis Bank Ltd v. TMS Legal Ltd.
Reform of the Consumer Credit Act - Presented by Lucy Walker (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Following the recent publication by HM Treasury of its policy statement on reform of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, Lucy Walker will look in detail at the scope and substance of the proposed reforms and will assess the likely shape of the future consumer credit regulatory regime.
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Not enough subject data for this period yet.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.