Fraud Talk
Fraud Talk is the ACFE’s monthly podcast dedicated to helping professionals who fight fraud on a daily basis. In these sessions, we break down case studies, talk with the industry’s leading experts and give you more tools you can use to spot, fight and prevent fraud.
- Indexed episodes, last 90 days
- 2
- Latest publication
- Sep 11, 2026
- Audience
- Checking…
- Earliest in this view
- Aug 7, 2026
Latest episodes
Sports Betting Fraud: How Fraudsters Are Gaming the System - Greg Gemignani - Episode 170 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
The sports betting boom has changed more than how people wager. It has opened new avenues for identity theft, money laundering and other forms of fraud. This episode of Fraud Talk takes a deep dive into a new Fraud Magazine article tracing the schemes taking shape across the industry. Gaming attorney Greg Gemignani joins us to unpack what makes sports betting attractive to fraudsters, where the vulnerabilities lie and what anti-fraud professionals should be watching as the industry continues to
Examining Interpol's Operation First Light 2026 - Mason Wilder and Jason Zirkle - Episode 169 (opens the original)
Read excerpt
In this episode of Fraud Talk, ACFE Research Director Mason Wilder, CFE, and Training Director Jason Zirkle, CFE, join the show to examine the results of Interpol's Operation First Light 2026, a global enforcement effort involving 97 countries that led to thousands of arrests, the identification of more than 142,000 victims and the interception of nearly $293 million in illicit funds. The conversation explores what an investigation of this size reveals about the modern fraud landscape, including
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
No verified audience measurement yet.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.