HeyJaredFei Gao
- Indexed articles, last 90 days
- 4
- Latest publication
- Aug 31, 2026
- Outlet visibility, for Switzer
- Top 5M sites
- Earliest in this view
- Jul 9, 2026
Latest articles
Why some US Republicans want to punish Australia over new charges for tech giants - Switzer (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Earlier this month, the federal government passed laws to encourage tech giants to pay Australian news businesses for journalism. This is known as the News Bargaining Incentive. For companies earning A$250 million or more in annual Australian digital advertising revenue (likely to include Meta, Google and TikTok), the scheme imposes a 2.75% charge on this revenue. That’s unless they have entered into commercial agreements with Australian media, to fund them directly. I’ve previously argued in Th
Why some US Republicans want to punish Australia over new charges for tech giants (opens the original)
Read excerpt
Earlier this month, the federal government passed laws to encourage tech giants to pay Australian news businesses for journalism. This is known as the News Bargaining Incentive. For companies earning A$250 million or more in annual Australian digital advertising revenue (likely to include Meta, Google and TikTok), the scheme imposes a 2.75% charge on this revenue. That’s unless they have entered into commercial agreements with Australian media, to fund them directly. I’ve previously argued in Th
How Australia’s new negative gearing rules might accidentally favour some property investors - Switzer (opens the original)
Read excerpt
For the best part of a century, Australian property investors have enjoyed a generous tax arrangement found in few other countries: the infamous “negative gearing”. Now, sweeping reforms to limit negative gearing to new builds and also change the way capital gains are taxed have become law. The federal government hopes to give first-home buyers a better shot at buying existing homes and at the same time redirect investor cash towards increasing housing supply. However, some of the practical impl
How Australia’s new negative gearing rules might accidentally favour some property investors (opens the original)
Read excerpt
For the best part of a century, Australian property investors have enjoyed a generous tax arrangement found in few other countries: the infamous “negative gearing”. Now, sweeping reforms to limit negative gearing to new builds and also change the way capital gains are taxed have become law. The federal government hopes to give first-home buyers a better shot at buying existing homes and at the same time redirect investor cash towards increasing housing supply. However, some of the practical impl
Publishing over time
Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.
Recurring subjects
Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.
Audience
Top 5M sites
For Switzer, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026
Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.
About this data
Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.
Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.