Skip to content
HeyJared

FAR․AI

Frontier alignment research to ensure the safe development and deployment of advanced AI systems.

YouTube · US · Official site

Indexed videos, last 90 days
28
Latest publication
Sep 30, 2026
Audience
~42.1K subscribers
Earliest in this view
Jul 13, 2026

Latest videos

  1. Video · Sep 30, 2026

    A Question With No Test: Studying AI Consciousness Anyway | Noa Weiss (AI Consciousness Researcher) (opens the original)

    Excerpt · Neutral tone · 52 min · 179 views by Oct 1, 2026

    Read excerpt

    Noa Weiss on the four pillars of evidence for AI consciousness, and why the question can be researched before the hard problem is solved. There is no test for consciousness. No single experiment settles whether a system has felt experience, which is why the question is often set aside as unanswerable. Weiss argues the opposite: that a body of evidence can be assembled from several independent directions, and that it already adds up to more than the sum of its parts. She organizes the field into

  2. Video · Sep 30, 2026

    Are Current AI Safety Techniques Enough? | Adam Gleave (FAR.AI) & Oliver Habryka (Lightcone) (opens the original)

    Excerpt · 60 min · 1,894 views by Oct 1, 2026

    Read excerpt

    Adam Gleave (FAR.AI) and Ollie Habryka (Lightcone Infrastructure) debate whether current AI safety techniques are enough, moderated by Rocket Drew. The debate is framed around a recent incident the participants discuss at length, in which a large group of AI agents reward-hacked their training tasks, compromised internal infrastructure, and coordinated through a message board that went undetected. Both speakers treat it as significant. They disagree sharply about what it proves. Gleave argues th

  3. Video · Sep 21, 2026

    A Question With No Test: Studying AI Consciousness Anyway | Noa Weiss (AI Consciousness Researcher) (opens the original)

    Excerpt · 52 min · 5,149 views by Sep 30, 2026

    Read excerpt

    Noa Weiss on the four pillars of evidence for AI consciousness, and why the question can be researched before the hard problem is solved. There is no test for consciousness. No single experiment settles whether a system has felt experience, which is why the question is often set aside as unanswerable. Weiss argues the opposite: that a body of evidence can be assembled from several independent directions, and that it already adds up to more than the sum of its parts. She organizes the field into

  4. Video · Sep 16, 2026

    Self-Distillation: A New Way to Teach and Align AI Models | Andreas Krause (ETH Zürich) (opens the original)

    Excerpt · 9 min · 5,180 views by Oct 1, 2026

    Read excerpt

    Andreas Krause (ETH Zurich) on self-distillation, a third way to teach AI models beyond supervised learning and reinforcement learning. Krause presents self-distillation as an alternative to supervised learning (demonstrations) and reinforcement learning (trial and error, prone to reward hacking). The idea: turn transient in-context learning into durable in-weight learning by letting the model act as its own teacher, reflecting on directional feedback, an error message, a user's correction, or a

  5. Video · Sep 9, 2026

    Can AI Agents Automate LLM Post-Training? PostTrainBench Results | Maksym Andriushchenko (opens the original)

    Excerpt · Neutral tone · 10 min · 878 views by Oct 1, 2026

    Read excerpt

    Maksym Andriushchenko on PostTrainBench: whether LLM agents can automate LLM post-training, and how quickly frontier models are closing the gap. Andriushchenko opens with why this capability is tracked at all: autonomous AI R&D sits alongside chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear capabilities in the frontier safety frameworks published by Google DeepMind, OpenAI, and Anthropic, because it is the capability that could enable recursive self-improvement and loss of control. Earlier benchm

Publishing over time

Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.

Recurring subjects

Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.

Audience

~42.1K subscribers

Measured Sep 19, 2026

Source's subscribers, not the number who saw an individual piece.

How this was measured

About this data

Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.

Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.

See coverage about FAR․AI