Skip to content
HeyJared

Defenders Podcast

Defenders is Dr. William Lane Craig's Sunday school class on Christian doctrine and apologetics

Podcast · By William Lane Craig · American English · Official site

Indexed episodes, last 90 days
10
Latest publication
Sep 9, 2026
Audience
Checking…
Earliest in this view
Jul 8, 2026

Latest episodes

  1. Episode · Sep 9, 2026

    Doctrine of the Last Things (Part 7): The Nature of the Second Coming (opens the original)

    Episode notes · Neutral tone

    Read excerpt

    Having rejected both the Rapture view and the Preterist view in prior lessons, Dr. William Lane Craig lays out the classical Christian position: Christ's return will be a single, visible event. In this lecture he examines four characteristics of that return. It will be personal, a literal coming of Christ himself, not a symbolic or figurative event. It will be glorious, a public display of power in contrast to the humility of his first coming. It will be decisive, bringing human history to its c

  2. Episode · Sep 2, 2026

    Doctrine of the Last Things (Part 6): The Preterist Interpretation Continued (opens the original)

    Episode notes

    Read excerpt

    Dr. William Lane Craig continues his critique of the preterist view that Christ's "coming" as the Son of Man was fulfilled in the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70. He argues, first, that the New Testament consistently describes this coming as visible and public: witnessed by everyone, not a secret event hidden from history. Second, he contends that Christ was already reigning as the risen and ascended King well before AD 70, so the Olivet Discourse can't be describing his enthronement in that y

  3. Episode · Aug 26, 2026

    Doctrine of the Last Things (Part 5): The Preterist Interpretation (opens the original)

    Episode notes

    Read excerpt

    Continuing the series on the Second Coming, Dr. William Lane Craig examines the Preterist view, the position, defended by scholars including G. B. Caird, R. T. France, and N. T. Wright, that the coming of the Son of Man predicted in Jesus' Olivet Discourse already happened in AD 70 with the destruction of Jerusalem. On this reading, the Great Tribulation was the horror of the Roman siege of Jerusalem, and the apocalyptic imagery of Mark 13 (e.g., darkened sun, falling stars) is symbolic language

  4. Episode · Aug 19, 2026

    Doctrine of the Last Things (Part 4): The Rapture Interpretation Concluded (opens the original)

    Episode notes

    Read excerpt

    Does the New Testament actually teach a secret "rapture" before Jesus' final return — or is that idea being read into the text rather than out of it? In this episode, Dr. William Lane Craig wraps up his case against the Rapture view by turning to the passage its defenders lean on most: 2 Thessalonians 2, where Paul tells the Thessalonians not to be shaken by claims that "the day of the Lord" has already come. Dr. Craig walks through Jesus' Olivet Discourse, Paul's letters to the Thessalonians an

  5. Episode · Aug 12, 2026

    Doctrine of the Last Things (Part 3): The Rapture Interpretation Continued (opens the original)

    Episode notes

    Read excerpt

    Dr. William Lane Craig continues his examination of the "secret rapture" view, tracing Paul's language about the Lord's coming through 1 and 2 Thessalonians, 1 Corinthians 15, and Jesus' own words in John 5 and Mark 13. He argues that the "coming of the Lord" in 1 Thessalonians 4 and the resurrection described in 1 Corinthians 15 are one and the same event as Christ's visible, glorious Second Coming and not a separate, secret snatching away of believers beforehand. Comparing the Greek vocabulary

Publishing over time

Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.

Recurring subjects

Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.

Audience

No verified audience measurement yet.

About this data

Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.

Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.

See coverage about Defenders Podcast