Skip to content
HeyJared

David Dierking

Reporter

Indexed articles, last 90 days
107
Latest publication
Sep 23, 2026
Outlet visibility, for yahoo.com
Top 1K sites
Earliest in this view
Jul 4, 2026

Latest articles

  1. Article · Sep 23, 2026 · David Dierking, The Motley Fool

    Vanguard S&P 500 ETF Long-Term Outlook: What History Tells Investors (opens the original)

    Excerpt · English

    Read excerpt

    Over the past several decades, the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) index has been one of the greatest wealth generation machines in history. Even more impressive is its simplicity -- invest in 500 of the largest companies in the United States and readjust periodically. No stock picking. No market timing. Just long-term compounding of growth. What will the next years, decades, and beyond look like for the S&P 500? History gives us a good idea of what to expect. Missed AI's "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x B

  2. Article · Sep 22, 2026 · David Dierking, The Motley Fool

    Could This Overlooked Vanguard ETF Make You a Millionaire? Here's What History Says (opens the original)

    Excerpt · English

    Read excerpt

    What if one of Vanguard's most overlooked ETFs could turn $1,000 a month into $1 million? The Vanguard Extended Market ETF (NYSEMKT: VXF) has historically generated returns capable of doing exactly that. And there's good reason to think its investment case could become more compelling over the coming decade. Missed AI's "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we're only at the end of "

  3. Article · Sep 22, 2026 · David Dierking, The Motley Fool

    Should You Invest $1,000 in SCHD Right Now? (opens the original)

    Excerpt · English

    Read excerpt

    After three years of disappointing performance, the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEMKT: SCHD) is on a tear again. Year to date, the fund is up 22.8% compared to an 11.8% gain for the S&P 500. That return puts it near the top of the U.S. dividend ETF category in 2026. Missed AI's "Act 1"? Act 2 Could Be 15x Bigger. Most investors think they missed the AI boat because they didn't buy Nvidia in 2005. But according to our analysts, we're only at the end of "Act 1"—the R&D phase. "Act 2" is the

  4. Article · Sep 21, 2026 · David Dierking, The Motley Fool

    Prediction: These 2 Vanguard ETFs Could Be Fantastic Long-Term Buys (opens the original)

    Excerpt · English

    Read excerpt

    There are a few things that go into making a great long-term portfolio holding. ETFs should be broadly diversified around a market or theme. They should come with ultra-low expense ratios. And you should easily be able to explain what they do and how they pick stocks. Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a compa

  5. Article · Sep 21, 2026 · David Dierking, The Motley Fool

    Does Long-Term Dividend Investing Really Work? This Study Says "Definitely." (opens the original)

    Excerpt · English

    Read excerpt

    The last few years have been almost entirely about investing in tech, growth, and artificial intelligence (AI) stocks. That trade has worked immensely well recently. But something has worked even better over the long term. Dividend stocks can look very boring at times. Names like Procter & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, and Colgate-Palmolive don't seem nearly as exciting as Nvidia, Micron Technology, and SK Hynix. Yet, exciting doesn't always translate into returns. Missed AI's "Act 1"? Act 2 Could

Publishing over time

Last 90 days. Choose a month to open its work.

Recurring subjects

Named in the text we hold. One piece can cover several.

Audience

Top 1K sites

For yahoo.com, the outlet · Measured Aug 1, 2026

Website popularity band, not a count of readers or article views.

About this data

Counts cover the work we have indexed. Tone needs enough text and a confident classification. Excerpts and episode notes are not full articles or transcripts.

Identity or attribution wrong? Suggest a correction.

See coverage about David Dierking